Calculation Method of the Productivity of Partially Perforated Vertical Well

Li Longlong; Wu Minglu; Yao Jun; Li Yang; Li Xiaoxue

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2014.03.016

Volume 42 Issue 3

May 2014

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Petroleum Drilling Techniques > 2014 > 42(3): 80-89. > DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2014.03.016

Li Longlong, Wu Minglu, Yao Jun, Li Yang, Li Xiaoxue. Calculation Method of the Productivity of Partially Perforated Vertical Well[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2014, 42(3): 80-89. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2014.03.016

Citation:

PDF (1314 KB)

Calculation Method of the Productivity of Partially Perforated Vertical Well

1.
School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum(Huadong), Qinqdao, Shandong, 266580, China;
2.
Department of Oilfield Exploration & Development, Sinopec, Beijing, 100029, China

More Information

Received Date: November 28, 2013
Revised Date: April 08, 2014

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

To accurately calculate the productivity of partially perforated well and provide theoretical foundation for optimization of perforation scheme,McLeod’s perforation geometric model is modified to dual radial flow model.Then,by considering penetrated and unpenetrated damaged zone,productivity calculation methods of partially perforated vertical well in isotropic reservoir was established based on the principle of fluid mechanics in porous medium and equivalent flowing resistance method.On the basis of this work,the productivity calculation methods of partially perforated vertical well in anisotropic reservoir was established by transforming anisotropic reservoir into isotropic reservoir based on the principle of fluid mechanics in anisotropic reservoir.Sensitivity analysis of the perforation parameter of partially perforated vertical well shows that perforated degree,perforation length,shot density and compaction degree have great effect on the productivity when the perforation has a perforated degree less than 70 percent,perforation length less than 80 cm,shot density less than 20 shots per meter and a compaction degree more than 75 percent.But perforation phasing,perforation diameter and crushed zone thickness have little effect on the productivity.The productivity of a reservoir with penetrated damaged zone is less sensitive to reservoirs with partially penetrated damaged zone.An example is provided and the difference between corresponding results of new method and skin method is about 5 percent.Results show that perforation length,shot density,perforation diameter,phasing,crushed zone thickness,compaction degree and perforated degree have a nonlinear relationship with productivity.

FullText(HTML)

References (23)

References

[1]	王海东, 孙新波.国内外射孔技术发展综述[J].爆破器材, 2006, 35(3):33-36. Wang Haidong, Sun Xinbo.Perforating technology development inside and outside of china[J].Explosive Materials, 2006, 35(3):33-36.
[2]	姚约东, 刘艳华.打开不完善井的合理产能评价[J].石油钻探技术, 2010, 38(2):14-18. Yao Yuedong, Liu Yanhua.Productivity evaluations of partial penetrating wells[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2010, 38(2):14-18.
[3]	张丽华.射孔参数对油井产能影响的分析[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版, 1993, 17(2):33-38. Zhang Lihua.Effect of perforation parameters on oil well productivity[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum, China:Edition of Natural Science, 1993, 17(2):33-38.
[4]	牛超群, 张玉金.油气井完井射孔技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 1994:61-67. Niu Chaoqun, Zhang Yujin.Perforating technology of oil and gas well completion[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industy Press, 1994:61-67.
[5]	Asadi M, Preston F W.Characterization of the crushed zone formed during jet perforation by qualitative scanning electron microscopy and quantitative image analysis[R].SPE 22812, 1991.
[6]	Pucknell J K, Berhmann L A.An investigation of the damaged zone created by perforating[R].SPE 22811, 1991.
[7]	牛华.试论射孔与油气井产能的关系[J].大庆石油学院学报, 1995, 19(2):32-34. Niu Hua.Discussion on the relationship of perforation and oil-gas well production[J].Journal of Daqing Petroleum Insititute, 1995, 19(2):32-34.
[8]	李东传, 唐国海, 孙新波, 等.射孔压实带研究[J].石油勘探与开发, 2000, 27(5):112-114. Li Dongchuan, Tang Guohai, Sun Xinbo, et al.A study on perforation crushed-zone[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2000, 27(5):112-114.
[9]	Harris M H.The effect of perforating oil well productivity[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1966, 18(4):518-528.
[10]	Klotz J A, Krueger R F, Pye D S.Effect of perforation damage on well productivity[R].SPE 4654, 1974.
[11]	McLeod H O, Jr.The effect of perforating conditions on well performance[R].SPE 10649, 1983.
[12]	Karakas Metin, Tariq S M.Semianalytical productivity models for perforated completions[R].SPE 21477, 1990.
[13]	唐愉拉, 潘迎德.有限元方法在射孔完井中的应用[J].石油学报, 1989, 10(3):48-58. Tang Yula, Pan Yingde.Evaluation of perforating completion by finite element method[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1989, 10(3):48-58.
[14]	唐愉拉, 潘迎德, 冯跃平.油、气井射孔完井产能预测和优化射孔设计[J].油气井测试, 1991(2):102-125, 101. Tang Yula, Pan Yingde, Feng Yueping.Productivity forecast and optimal design of the perforated oil and gas well[J].Well Testing, 1991(2):102-125, 101.
[15]	郎兆新, 张丽华, 朱九成, 等.射孔工程应用软件WPSYS-A的开发[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版, 1992, 16(6):42-48. Lang Zhaoxin, Zhang Lihua, Zhu Jiucheng, et al.Development of well perforation engineering software WPSYS-A[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum, China:Edition of Natural Science, 1992, 16(6):42-48.
[16]	李祥贵, 王清河, 李元.射孔完井模型的数值模拟[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版, 1996, 20(2):48-53. Li Xianggui, Wang Qinghe, Li Yuan.Numerical simulation model of perforated well completions[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum, China:Edition of Natural Science, 1996, 20(2):48-53.
[17]	成绥民, 王天顺.表皮系数系统分解方法[J].油气井测试, 1992(1):35-40. Cheng Suimin, Wang Tianshun.The system decomposition method of the skin factor[J].Well Testing, 1992(1):35-40.
[18]	张红霞.表皮系数系统分解研究与应用[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院, 2006:8-12. Zhang Hongxia.The system decomposition research and application of the skin factor[D].Qingdao: China University of Petroleum(Huadong), School of Petroleum Engineering, 2006:8-12.
[19]	张建国, 杜殿发, 侯健, 等.油气层渗流力学[M].2版.东营:中国石油大学出版社, 2009:126-133. Zhang Jianguo, Du Dianfa, Hou Jian, et al.Seepage mechanics of reservoir[M].2nd ed.Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press, 2009:126-133.
[20]	Joshi S D.A review of horizontal well anddrainhole technology[R].SPE 16868, 1987.
[21]	陈元千, 邹存友.考虑各向异性和偏心距影响的水平井产量公式推导、对比与应用[J].新疆石油地质, 2009, 30(4):486-489. Chen Yuanqian, Zou Cunyou.Derivation, comparison and application of horizontal well production formula considering anisotropy and eccentricity effects[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2009, 30(4):486-489.
[22]	葛家理, 刘月田, 姚约东.现代油藏渗流力学原理:下[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2003:29-51. Ge Jiali, Liu Yuetian, Yao Yuedong.Seepage mechanics principle of reservoir in modern:part Ⅱ[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industy Press, 2003:29-51.
[23]	Besson J.Performance of slanted and horizontal wells on an anisotropic medium[R].SPE 20965, 1990.

[1]	XU Xiaokai, ZHAO Weina, ZHANG Jinyan, DONG Jingli, SUN Qingxi, WANG Lei. Recursive Algorithm for Electromagnetic Fields from Magnetic Dipole in Layered Triaxial Anisotropic Medium and Its Application[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2024, 52(1): 130-139. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2023117
[2]	HU Wenliang, ZHANG Guodong, LIU Baoyin, LUO Jian, WEI Xiaohan. Formation Anisotropy Characterization Method Based on Micro-Resistivity Imaging Logging[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2023, 51(2): 125-130. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2023048
[3]	LIU Tianlin, YUE Xizhou, LI Guoyu, MA Mingxue, WANG Yiyi. Study over the Geo-Signal Properties of Ultra-Deep Electromagnetic Wave Logging While Drilling[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2022, 50(6): 41-48. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2022110
[4]	JIA Qingsheng, ZHONG Anhai, ZHANG Zilin, DING Ran. Numerical Simulation of the Brittleness Anisotropy of Laminated Argillaceous Limestone Facies Shale in the Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(4): 78-84. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2021086
[5]	XIA Hongquan, LIU Chang, LI Gaoren, JIANG Tingwei. A Logging Data-Based Calculation Method for the Horizontal TIV Formation In-Situ Stress[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(6): 67-72. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2019130
[6]	HONG Guobin, CHEN Mian, LU Yunhu, JIN Yan. Study on the Anisotropy Characteristics of Deep Shale in the Southern Sichuan Basin and Their Impacts on Fracturing Pressure[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2018, 46(3): 78-85. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2018022
[7]	GE Hongqi, JIN Kenian, WU Qinxuan. Fracture Prediction in a Carbonate Reservoir Based on Logging-Seismic Data[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2017, 45(5): 118-126. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201705021
[8]	YANG Zhen, WEN Yi, XIAO Hongbing. A New Method of Detecting while Drilling Resistivity Anisotropy with Azimuthal Electromagnetic Wave Tools[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(3): 115-120. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201603021

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

1.	幸雪松，闫新江，文敏，张永涛，毕刚，齐致远. 双层套管射孔产能预测模型数值模拟研究. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(02): 96-104 .
2.	毕刚，吴捷敏，杨尚谕，李蒙蒙，韩斐，汪鑫，崔颖. 不同储层射孔参数适用性评价技术研究. 煤田地质与勘探. 2023(07): 80-91 .
3.	王雷，赵洪绪，景社，于伟强. 西湖凹陷探井射孔参数优化方法. 油气井测试. 2023(05): 44-49 .
4.	郑亚军，刘宝成，张旭泽，薛永超，宋方新，蒋天昊. 数据驱动与地质规律融合的超低渗油藏产能预测方法——以元284超低渗油藏为例. 石油地质与工程. 2022(04): 75-81 .
5.	刘海龙. 油水两相平面径向渗流压差时量理论研究. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(05): 85-97 .
6.	李东传，曹振斌. 聚能射孔器同孔重复射孔作用效果试验研究. 油气井测试. 2019(02): 40-44 .
7.	关利军，李纪智，何泽俊，林炳南. 基于双径向流模型的产能计算及射孔优化技术. 石油化工应用. 2019(05): 35-42+60 .
8.	董文秀，王晓冬，王家航. 各向异性储层部分射开斜井新表皮模型. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(01): 104-113 .
9.	董文秀，王晓冬，王家航. 各向异性储层部分射开直井不稳态压力分析. 东北石油大学学报. 2017(06): 96-104+125-126 .

Other cited types(7)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (2809) PDF downloads (3826) Cited by(16)

Calculation Method of the Productivity of Partially Perforated Vertical Well

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

Other cited types(7)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

Calculation Method of the Productivity of Partially Perforated Vertical Well

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

Other cited types(7)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content