NI Xiaowei, XU Guanyou, AO Xuanfeng, FENG Jiaming, AI Lin, LIU Diren. The Influencing Factors on the Polarizing Angle of Array Laterolog Curves[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2018, 46(2): 120-126. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2018017
Citation: NI Xiaowei, XU Guanyou, AO Xuanfeng, FENG Jiaming, AI Lin, LIU Diren. The Influencing Factors on the Polarizing Angle of Array Laterolog Curves[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2018, 46(2): 120-126. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2018017

The Influencing Factors on the Polarizing Angle of Array Laterolog Curves

More Information
  • Received Date: August 08, 2017
  • The polarizing angle of a laterolog curve is helpful in the interpretation of geological structures and the assessment of formation interfaces,but the distortion of the resistivity curve and the features of "false thin layers" can also occur.Therefore,it is of great significance for evaluating oil and gas reservoirs to identify the influencing factors of the polarizing angle by using a forward calculation.Three-dimensional finite element numerical simulation is used to set up a layered media model,which facilitates evaluating the influence of a series of factors on polarizing angle characteristics,such as the surrounding rock resistivity,drilling fluid resistivity,invasion zone characteristics,instrument characteristics,layer thickness,well diameter,well angle,etc.The forward calculation results showed that when the ratio of the resistivity of the target rock to that of the surrounding rock is greater than 4,the polarizing angle will be sharper and the amplitude increased rapidly.They also showed that the resistivity of drilling fluid mainly affects the shape of the polarizing angle so that the greater the resistivity of drilling fluid,the sharper the polarizing angle.The influence of invasion zone on the polarizing angle is more complex.Well designers should carefully consider the invasion resistivity and depth.The detection depth of the instrument has little effect on the polarizing angle shape,but the higher the vertical resolution of instrument,the flatter the polarizing angle,and the smaller the amplitude.Further,the bigger the well diameter,the less obvious the polarizing angle is.Revealingly,when the formation thickness is less than the vertical resolution of the instrument,the polarizing angle of the array laterolog disappears.With the increase of formation thickness,the polarization angle becomes larger,and it tends to be flat.However,when the angle of inclination is more than 60°,the polarizing angle basically disappears.Likewise,the smaller the inclination angle,the more obvious the polarizing angle.The research results indicated that the effect of surrounding rock resistivity,instrument vertical resolution,and layer thickness had the most obvious effect on the polarizing angle.This could provide guidance for the correct application of the polarizing angle to interpret oil and gas reservoirs.
  • [1]
    范晓敏.双侧向测井曲线形状与地层侵入关系研究[J].地球物理学进展,2007,22(1):142-146. FAN Xiaomin.Investigation on the relation between form of laterologs and invasion state of reservoir[J].Progress in Geophysics,2007,22(1):142-146.
    [2]
    范宜仁,巫振观,王磊,等.大斜度井各向异性地层双感应测井响应特征研究[J].测井技术,2016,40(3):262-269,275. FAN Yiren,WU Zhenguan,WANG Lei,et al.Response characteristics of dual induction logging in anisotropic formation and high deviated wells[J].Well Logging Technology,2016,40(3):262-269,275.
    [3]
    ANDERSON B I,BANNER S,LULING M G,et al.Response of 2-MHz LWD resistivity and wireline induction tools in dipping beds and laminated formations[R].SPWLA-1990-A,1990.
    [4]
    杨震,范宜仁,文艺,等.三维频率域随钻电磁波测井数值模拟[J].地球物理学进展,2009,24(5):1833-1838. YANG Zhen,FAN Yiren,WEN Yi,et al.Three-dimensional numerical simulation of electromagnetic logging-while-drilling tool response in frequency domain[J].Progress in Geophysics,2009,24(5):1833-1838.
    [5]
    朱庚雪,刘得军,张颖颖,等.基于hp-FEM的随钻电磁波测井仪器响应正演分析[J].石油钻探技术,2015,43(2):63-70. ZHU Gengxue,LIU Dejun,ZHANG Yingying,et al.Forward modeling of responses of an ELWD tool based on hp-FEM[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2015,43(2):63-70.
    [6]
    李勇华,杨锦舟,杨震,等.随钻电阻率地层边界响应特征分析及应用[J].石油钻探技术,2016,44(6):111-116. LI Yonghua,YANG Jinzhou,YANG Zhen,et al.The analysis and application of formation interface response characteristics of the resistivity LWD tool[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2016,44(6):111-116.
    [7]
    WANG T L,SIGNORELLI J.Finite-difference modeling of electromagnetic tool response for logging while drilling[J].Geophysics,2004,69(1):152-160.
    [8]
    刘迪仁,万文春,夏培,等.不同井眼条件下的水平井双侧向测井响应[J].物探与化探,2012,36(3):422-425. LIU Diren,WAN Wenchun,XIA Pei,et al.The response of dual laterolog to different borehole conditions in the horizontal well[J].Geophysical Geochemical Exploration,2012,36(3):422-425.
    [9]
    张庚骥.电阻率测井响应的积分方程解法[J].地球物理学报,1985,28(5):519-525. ZHANG Gengji.The response of resistivity logging obtained by solving integral equations[J].Acta Geophysica Sinica,1985,28(5):519-525.
    [10]
    夏培,刘迪仁,万文春,等.水平井各向异性地层双侧向测井响应数值模拟[J].石油天然气学报,2011,33(8):104-106. XIA Pei,LIU Diren,WAN Wenchun,et al.Numerical simulation of dual laterolog response in anisotropic formation of horizontal wells[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2011,33(8):104-106.
    [11]
    陈亮.斜井、水平井双侧向测井响应三维有限元数值分析[D].杭州:浙江大学,2008. CHEN Liang.Three dimensional finite element numerical analysis of dual laterolog response in inclined shaft and horizontal well[D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2008.
    [12]
    仵杰,谢尉尉,解茜草,等.阵列侧向测井仪器的正演响应分析[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2008,23(1):73-76,80. WU Jie,XIE Weiwei,XIE Xicao,et al.Forward response analysis of array lateral logging tool[J].Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2008,23(1):73-76,80.
    [13]
    刘振华,胡启.阵列侧向测井响应的计算及其特征[J].西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),2002,17(1):53-57. LIU Zhenhua,HU Qi.Calculation and characteristics of array laterlog responses[J].Journal of Xi’an Petroleum Institute(Natural Science Edition),2002,17(1):53-57.
    [14]
    杨韡.阵列侧向测井的正反演[J].勘探地球物理进展,2003,26(4):305-308. YANG Wei.Forward and backward in array lateral logging[J].Progress in Exploration Geophysics,2003,26(4):305-308.
    [15]
    柳杰.电流势法在直流电测井模拟中的应用[D].杭州:浙江大学,2015. LIU Jie.Application of current potential method in DC electrical logging[D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2015.
  • Related Articles

    [1]JIA Qingsheng, ZHONG Anhai, ZHANG Zilin, DING Ran. Numerical Simulation of the Brittleness Anisotropy of Laminated Argillaceous Limestone Facies Shale in the Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(4): 78-84. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2021086
    [2]LI Hongqiang, WANG Ruihe. Research on Environmental Correction Method of Measurement Results from Near-Bit Gamma Imagers[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(3): 142-150. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2021024
    [3]ZHENG Jian, GAO Hui, HUANG Lugang, DUAN Junya, DONG Duo. Correcting Errors Due to Borehole and Formation Factors during Azimuthal Gamma Spectrum Logging While Drilling[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(1): 104-113. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2019131
    [4]NI Xiaowei, XU Sihui, BIE Kang, FENG Jiaming, XU Guanyou, LIU Diren. Surrounding Rock Influence Correction for Array Laterolog Responses with Borehole Eccentricities in Horizontal Wells[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2018, 46(4): 121-126. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2018056
    [5]YU Hongmin, WANG Youqi, NIE Jun, LYU Chengyuan, CUI Wenfu, ZHANG Li. Study and Application of a Correction Method for the Relative Permeability Curve of a High Water Injection Multiple[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2018, 46(4): 104-108. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2018080
    [6]HONG Guobin, CHEN Mian, LU Yunhu, JIN Yan. Study on the Anisotropy Characteristics of Deep Shale in the Southern Sichuan Basin and Their Impacts on Fracturing Pressure[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2018, 46(3): 78-85. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2018022
    [7]YANG Zhen, WEN Yi, XIAO Hongbing. A New Method of Detecting while Drilling Resistivity Anisotropy with Azimuthal Electromagnetic Wave Tools[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(3): 115-120. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201603021
    [8]Xu Haodong, Huang Genlu, Zhang Ran, Wei Hongshu, Cheng Fengrui. Method of Magnetic Interference Correction in Survey with Magnetic MWD[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2014, 42(2): 102-106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2014.02.020
    [9]Xie Yuning, Zhou Xiaoyu. Quantitative Calculation and Correction of the Influence of Microannulus on Acoustic Amplitude Log[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2013, 41(1): 45-50. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2013.01.009
    [10]Sidney Green. Full-Scale Deep Well Drilling Simulation[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2011, 39(3): 1-5. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2011.03.001
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 张诗达,朱勇,高强,苏红. 旋冲钻井技术研究现状与展望. 排灌机械工程学报. 2024(05): 497-507 .
    2. 张炜,王海华,翁炜,姚树青,邵明娟. 美国能源部地热钻井技术研发最新部署及干热岩开发示范创新实践. 钻探工程. 2024(03): 1-8 .
    3. 戴一凡,侯冰,廖志豪. 基于相场法的深层干热岩储层水力压裂模拟研究. 石油钻探技术. 2024(02): 229-235 . 本站查看
    4. 李宽,施山山,张新刚,王跃伟,许洁,张恒春. 干热岩定向钻井关键技术研究与应用. 钻采工艺. 2024(05): 7-14 .
    5. 王瑞,韩子剑,雷鸣,夏杨,张益华,陈子豪,王鹏. 废弃油井改地热井的井筒传热规律分析. 钻采工艺. 2023(05): 54-60 .
    6. 周乐. 高温地热高效开发钻井关键技术探究. 云南化工. 2022(01): 125-126 .
    7. 李根生,武晓光,宋先知,周仕明,李铭辉,朱海燕,孔彦龙,黄中伟. 干热岩地热资源开采技术现状与挑战. 石油科学通报. 2022(03): 343-364 .
    8. 曹华庆,吴波,龙志平,王殿学,黄干廷,马向东. 京津冀岩溶热储钻井关键技术. 石油钻探技术. 2021(02): 42-47 . 本站查看
    9. 贺志铎. 干热岩开发及发电技术应用分析. 云南化工. 2021(05): 98-100 .
    10. 刘畅,许洁,冉恒谦. 干热岩抗高温环保水基钻井液体系. 钻井液与完井液. 2021(04): 412-422 .
    11. 郝亚龙,葛云华,崔猛,纪国栋,殷鸽,黄家根. 钻头选型中的地层分层技术. 断块油气田. 2020(02): 248-252 .
    12. 谢文苹,路睿,张盛生,朱进守,于漂罗,张珊珊. 青海共和盆地干热岩勘查进展及开发技术探讨. 石油钻探技术. 2020(03): 77-84 . 本站查看
    13. 窦凤珂. 干热岩勘查及开发利用的关键技术. 化工设计通讯. 2020(10): 157-158 .
    14. 王恒,王磊,张东清,张进双. 干热岩钻井钻具磨损及防磨技术研究. 石油钻探技术. 2020(06): 47-53 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1753) PDF downloads (1873) Cited by(20)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return