Volume 50 Issue 5
Sep.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
ZHANG Zhengyu, YUAN Jun, LI Yangbing. Application of rigid HTHP pipe-conveyed memory logging system in ultra-deep wells [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques，2022, 50(5)：117-124. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2022079
Citation: ZHANG Zhengyu, YUAN Jun, LI Yangbing. Application of rigid HTHP pipe-conveyed memory logging system in ultra-deep wells [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques，2022, 50(5)：117-124. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2022079
shu

Application of Rigid HTHP Pipe-Conveyed Memory Logging Systemin Ultra-Deep Wells

  • Southwest Logging & Control Company, Sinopec Matrix Corporation, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610100, China

More Information
  • Received Date: April 01, 2022
  • Revised Date: July 09, 2022
  • Accepted Date: July 15, 2022
  • Available Online: November 03, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract

  • In hostile condition wells, such as high-temperature high-pressure(HTHP) ones and ultra-deep and highly deviated ones, etc., conventional logging methods no longer meet the requirements of safe and efficient oil and gas resource development due to technological and instrumental limitations. Therefore, new logging technologies such as pipe-conveyed memory logging system have been employed extensively. Based on the introduction of the constitution of the rigid HTHP pipe-conveyed memory logging system, its technological advantages were summarized. Furthermore, the typical application scenarios and results of this system in ultra-deep wells of Sichuan Basin and Tarim Basin were analyzed. The field applications show that the success rate of the pipe-conveyed memory logging system in the logging of ultra-deep wells is not less than 95% with the shortest operation time. It suggests that the system can effectively solve the logging problems under the conditions of tight hole, lost circulation, and complex wellbore trajectory. Compared with other logging methods, this logging system offers higher logging efficiency and greater operation success rate, therefore, it demonstrates great potential in the logging of complex ultra-deep wells, and its application can be scaled up broadly as well.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (27)
  • [1]
    邹才能,潘松圻,赵群. 论中国 “能源独立” 战略的内涵、挑战及意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2020,47(2):416–426. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.02.21

    ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, ZHAO Qun. On the connotation, challenge and significance of China’s “energy independence” strategy[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(2): 416–426. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.02.21
    [2]
    邹才能,潘松圻,党刘栓. 论能源革命与科技使命[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2019,41(3):1–12.

    ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, DANG Liushuan. On the energy revolution and the mission of science and technology[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2019, 41(3): 1–12.
    [3]
    漆立新. 塔里木盆地顺北超深断溶体油藏特征与启示[J]. 中国石油勘探,2020,25(1):102–111. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2020.01.010

    QI Lixin. Characteristics and inspiration of ultra-deep fault-karst reservoir in the Shunbei area of the Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(1): 102–111. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2020.01.010
    [4]
    马海陇,邓光校,王震,等. 塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡玉中构造带特征及石油地质意义[J]. 断块油气田,2022,29(1):1–7.

    MA Hailong, DENG Guangxiao, WANG Zhen, et al. Characteristics and petroleum geological significance of Yuzhong structural belt in Maigaiti slope, Tarim Basin[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2022, 29(1): 1–7.
    [5]
    李宝帅. 库车坳陷克拉苏构造带深层致密砂岩气成藏机制[J]. 特种油气藏,2021,28(5):17–22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.05.003

    LI Baoshuai. Accumulation mechanism of deep tight sandstone gas reservoir in Kelasu structural belt, Kuqa Depression[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2021, 28(5): 17–22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.05.003
    [6]
    陈强路,席斌斌,韩俊,等. 塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区超深层油藏保存及影响因素: 来自流体包裹体的证据[J]. 中国石油勘探,2020,25(3):121–133. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2020.03.011

    CHEN Qianglu, XI Binbin, HAN Jun, et al. Preservation and influence factors of ultra-deep oil reservoirs in Shuntuoguole area, Tarim Basin: evidence from fluid inclusions[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(3): 121–133. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2020.03.011
    [7]
    焦方正. 塔里木盆地顺北特深碳酸盐岩断溶体油气藏发现意义与前景[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2018,39(2):207–216. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180201

    JIAO Fangzheng. Significance and prospect of ultra-deep carbonate fault-karst reservoirs in Shunbei area, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(2): 207–216. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180201
    [8]
    张正玉. 泵出式测井系统在四川地区复杂井中的应用[J]. 测井技术,2012,36(4):426–430. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2012.04.021

    ZHANG Zhengyu. Application of pump-out logging system to complex wells in Sichuan Oilfield[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2012, 36(4): 426–430. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2012.04.021
    [9]
    刘镇江,汪小军. 放射性同位素测井技术在多层管柱配注井中的应用[J]. 特种油气藏,2021,28(4):164–169. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.04.023

    LIU Zhenjiang, WANG Xiaojun. Application of radioisotope logging technology in injection wells with multi-layer strings[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2021, 28(4): 164–169. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.04.023
    [10]
    赵雷. 川西地区复杂水平井泵送电缆释放测井工艺[J]. 石油钻探技术,2015,43(6):66–69. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.201506012

    ZHAO Lei. Cable conveying and releasing logging meter in complicated horizontal wells in western Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2015, 43(6): 66–69. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.201506012
    [11]
    刘殿清. 元坝气田超深水平井测井难点与对策[J]. 天然气工业,2016,36(增刊1):26–32.

    LIU Dianqing. Difficult difficulties and countermeasures of ultra-deep horizontal well in Yuanba Gas Field[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(supplement1): 26–32.
    [12]
    药晓江,卢华涛,尚捷,等. 随钻测井仪流道转换器优化设计与数值分析[J]. 石油钻探技术,2021,49(5):121–126. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2021069

    YAO Xiaojiang, LU Huatao, SHANG Jie, et al. Optimization design and numerical analysis of flow passage converters in LWD tools[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(5): 121–126. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2021069
    [13]
    康正明,柯式镇,李新,等. 随钻电阻率成像测井仪定量评价地层界面探究[J]. 石油钻探技术,2020,48(4):124–130. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2020087

    KANG Zhengming, KE Shizhen, LI Xin, et al. Probe into quantitative stratigraphic interface evaluation using a resistivity imaging LWD tool[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(4): 124–130. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2020087
    [14]
    陈斌,蔺敬旗,李兆春,等. 阵列声波测井在页岩油体积压裂效果评价中的应用[J]. 断块油气田,2021,28(4):550–554.

    CHEN Bin, LIN Jingqi, LI Zhaochun, et al. Application of array acoustic logging in shale oil volume fracturing effect evaluation[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2021, 28(4): 550–554.
    [15]
    黄鹏宾. 存储式测井技术研究[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量,2017,37(10):187–188. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4076.2017.10.086

    HUANG Pengbin. Research on storage-type logging technology[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2017, 37(10): 187–188. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4076.2017.10.086
    [16]
    孙玉刚. 裸眼存储式测井技术在页岩气测井中的应用[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量,2020,40(13):205–206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4076.2020.13.099

    SUN Yugang. Application of open-hole storage logging technology in shale gas logging[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2020, 40(13): 205–206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4076.2020.13.099
    [17]
    缪祥禧,徐勇,彭华君,等. 泵出存储式测井深度异常现象分析[J]. 国外测井技术,2015(3):33–35.

    MIAO Xiangxi, XU Yong, PENG Huajun, et al. Analysis of pump storage logging depth[J]. World Well Logging Technology, 2015(3): 33–35.
    [18]
    张雄辉,游畅,华远飞. 超高温高压井测井技术及应用探讨[J]. 石化技术,2021,28(4):65–66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0235.2021.04.028

    ZHANG Xionghui, YOU Chang, HUA Yuanfei. Discussion on logging technology and application of ultra high temperature and high pressure well[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2021, 28(4): 65–66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0235.2021.04.028
    [19]
    蒋建平,罗荣,崔光. 超深、超长水平井测井工艺技术研究与应用[J]. 中外能源,2013,18(11):40–45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-579X.2013.11.008

    JIANG Jianping, LUO Rong, CUI Guang. Research and application of the logging technology for super deep and super long horizontal well[J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2013, 18(11): 40–45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-579X.2013.11.008
    [20]
    近藤信也,李世雄,刘小梅,等. 在超深井环境下使用电缆测井仪的若干问题[J]. 国外测井技术,1995,10(4):23–28.

    JINTENG Xinye, LI Shixiong, LIU Xiaomei, et al. Several problems of using cable logging instrument in ultra-deep well environment[J]. World Well Logging Technology, 1995, 10(4): 23–28.
    [21]
    翟小强,王瑛,刘伟,等. 存储式井下振动测量工具的设计与室内试验[J]. 石油钻探技术,2011,39(4):111–114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2011.04.024

    ZHAI Xiaoqiang, WANG Ying, LIU Wei, et al. Design and laboratory test of memory downhole vibration measurement instrument[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2011, 39(4): 111–114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2011.04.024
    [22]
    赵业卫. 存储式多参数生产测井技术[J]. 测井技术,2006,30(3):276–279. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2006.03.028

    ZHAO Yewei. Memory multi-parameter production logging technique[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2006, 30(3): 276–279. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2006.03.028
    [23]
    曹博凡,刘湘政,张雄辉,等. 存储式测井仪器状态监测系统设计[J]. 测井技术,2018,42(3):347–351.

    CAO Bofan, LIU Xiangzheng, ZHANG Xionghui, et al. Design of logging tool condition monitoring system for storage logging technology[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2018, 42(3): 347–351.
    [24]
    刘广华,段润梅. 无电缆存储式测井技术在水平井中的应用[J]. 化工管理,2017(22):120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-4800.2017.22.104

    LIU Guanghua, DUAN Runmei. Design of logging tool condition monitoring system for storage logging technology[J]. Chemical Enterprise Management, 2017(22): 120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-4800.2017.22.104
    [25]
    张年英. 存储式测井仪器发展现状及展望[J]. 化学工程与装备,2019(7):72–73.

    ZHANG Nianying. Development status and prospect of storage logging instrument[J]. Chemical Engineering & Equipment, 2019(7): 72–73.
    [26]
    SY/T 5132—2012　石油测井原始资料质量规范[S].

    SY/T 5132—2012　Quality specifications for original petroleum logging information[S].
    [27]
    张钰. 直推式存储测井工艺在西北油田的应用[J]. 石油钻探技术,2021,49(1):121–126. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2021018

    ZHANG Yu. Application of direct-push storage logging technology in the Northwest Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(1): 121–126. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2021018
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(16)

    1. 田军政，谢雄武，钱坤，刘长春，马业. 基于CNN-BiLSTM-Attention的油气井固井施工参数监测与预测研究. 计算机测量与控制. 2025(02): 54-62 .
    2. 李振，张康康，曾靖，王超，张长齐，赵正超，金旭阳. 超高压尾管回接压裂关键密封技术研究. 石油矿场机械. 2025(03): 85-90 .
    3. 陈力力，马勇，付强，陈敏，付志，汪瑶，冯予淇，刘强，杨万忠，邹祥富，严海兵. 超大尺寸井眼固井关键技术探索与实践——以SDCK1万米特深井为例. 天然气工业. 2025(05): 113-123 .
    4. 李振. 球座式胶塞挡块套筒仿真分析与试验. 机械制造. 2025(06): 27-30 .
    5. 聂臻，夏朝辉，吴波鸿，黄雪琴. 中东地区碳酸盐岩油藏钻井工程技术现状及发展趋势. 石油钻探技术. 2024(01): 8-16 . 本站查看
    6. 邓嵘，何香江，黄安龙. PDC齿压入破岩过程的岩石裂纹特征试验研究. 石油钻探技术. 2024(01): 38-44 . 本站查看
    7. 蔡明杰，罗鑫，陈力力，贺明敏，彭浩，何兵. 万米深井SDCK1井超大尺寸井眼钻井技术. 石油钻探技术. 2024(02): 87-92 . 本站查看
    8. 姚军，王春起，黄朝琴，杨永飞，孙海，张磊. 深层超深层油气藏高应力下数字岩心构建方法. 石油钻探技术. 2024(02): 38-47 . 本站查看
    9. 狄勤丰，尤明铭，李田心，周星，杨赫源，王文昌. 特深井钻柱动力学特性模拟与分析. 石油钻探技术. 2024(02): 108-117 . 本站查看
    10. 黎然，李文哲，张佳寅，刘阳. 万米深井SDCK1井上部超大尺寸井眼钻井液技术. 石油钻探技术. 2024(02): 93-99 . 本站查看
    11. 杨尚谕，闫炎，韩礼红，曹婧，牟易升. 页岩油气井筒全生命周期完整性技术研究进展. 石油管材与仪器. 2024(03): 1-6+111-112 .
    12. 刘曼宇，李早元，刘伟，刘洋，黄盛，杨焱岚，陈俊文. 空心玻璃微珠低密度水泥有效弹性模量计算与分析. 断块油气田. 2024(05): 900-908+915 .
    13. 周仕明，陆沛青. 井筒密封完整性监测与智能感知技术进展与展望. 石油钻探技术. 2024(05): 35-41 . 本站查看
    14. 周忠鸣，陈军海，李丹丹，孙倩倩，贾延军，江嘉俊. 灯影组白云岩高温后单轴力学特性及本构模型研究. 钻探工程. 2024(06): 59-66 .
    15. 李涛，苏强，杨哲，徐卫强，胡锡辉. 川西地区超深井钻井完井技术现状及攻关方向. 石油钻探技术. 2023(02): 7-15 . 本站查看
    16. 刘奎，丁士东，初永涛，刘仍光. 页岩气井压裂交变载荷水泥环密封能力研究. 石油机械. 2023(11): 79-86 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (487) PDF downloads (85) Cited by(18)
    Related

    Supervisor：SINOPEC GROUP

    Sponsor：Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering

    Serial Number：CN 11-1763/TE, ISSN 1001-0890

    Chief Editor： WANG Minsheng

    Vice Chief Editor：LIU Xiushan, ZHOU Shiming, CHEN Zuo, YE Haichao,
    CHEN Huinian

    Address：Sinopec Science and Technology Research Center, No.197 Baisha Road, Changping District, Beijing, China

    Tel：010-56606846, 56606847, 56606848, 56606849, 56606850

    E-mail：syzt@vip.163.com

    Copyright © 2009《Petroleum Drilling Techniques 》 All Rights Reserved.

    京公网安备 11010502036328号 京ICP备17033152号

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return