Lietard天然裂缝宽度预测模型求解新方法

彭浩, 李黔, 尹虎, 唐志强

彭浩, 李黔, 尹虎, 唐志强. Lietard天然裂缝宽度预测模型求解新方法[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2016, 44(3): 72-76. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201603013
引用本文: 彭浩, 李黔, 尹虎, 唐志强. Lietard天然裂缝宽度预测模型求解新方法[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2016, 44(3): 72-76. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201603013
PENG Hao, LI Qian, YIN Hu, TANG Zhiqiang. A New Solution Method for the Lietard Natural Fracture Width Prediction Model[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(3): 72-76. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201603013
Citation: PENG Hao, LI Qian, YIN Hu, TANG Zhiqiang. A New Solution Method for the Lietard Natural Fracture Width Prediction Model[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(3): 72-76. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201603013

Lietard天然裂缝宽度预测模型求解新方法

基金项目: 

国家科技重大专项课题"钻井工程设计和工艺软件"(编号:2011ZX05021-006)资助。

详细信息
    作者简介:

    彭浩(1988-),男,四川达州人,2011年毕业于西南石油大学石油工程专业,在读硕士研究生,主要从事井漏分析及钻井工程设计研究工作。E-mailpenghao323@qq.com。

  • 中图分类号: TE258

A New Solution Method for the Lietard Natural Fracture Width Prediction Model

  • 摘要: 采用图版法求解Lietard天然裂缝宽度预测模型时速度慢、易产生人为误差,为迅速准确地预测井漏时的天然裂缝宽度,给堵漏作业和屏蔽暂堵作业提供决策依据,开展了数值解法研究。研究Lietard模型发现,用Lietard模型计算得到的理论漏失特征曲线存在近似直线段,可作线性化处理,因此,基于井漏时实测得到的漏失数据,采用最小二乘法建立实钻漏失特征曲线近似直线段线性参数的计算模型,并运用自适应搜索法找出与实钻漏失特征曲线唯一对应的理论漏失特征曲线,根据该曲线的无因次有限侵入值反演出天然裂缝宽度。经过试验研究,建立了实钻漏失特征曲线近似直线段线性参数的计算模型,实现了无盲区自动匹配,将匹配误差控制在0.001%以内,克服了人为误差,并能快速完成Lietard模型求解。研究结果表明,Lietard模型的求解精度与实钻漏失特征曲线近似直线段的线性相关度呈正比关系,在同一相关度下,新方法比图版法求解速度更快、精度更高。
    Abstract: When the Lietard natural fracture width prediction model is solved by means of the chart method, the solving velocity is low and human errors tend to occur. In order to quickly and accurately predict the natural width with lost circulation and provide a decision-making basis for plugging operations and shield temporary plugging operations, the numerical solution method for Lietard model was studied in this paper. It was shown from the analysis on Lietard model that there was an approximate straight line section in the theoretical leakage characteristics curve obtained from Lietard model and it could be linearized. Based on the measured leakage data during the lost circulation, the calculation model for the linear parameters of approximate straight line section in the actual drilling leakage characteristics curve was established by means of the least square method. After the theoretical leakage characteristics curve which was the only one corresponding to the actual drilling leakage characteristics curve was identified by using the adaptive search method, natural fracture width could be inversed on the basis of the dimensionless finite invasion factor. Based on experimental studies, the calculation model for the linear parameters of approximate straight line section in the actual drilling leakage characteristics curve was built up and automatic matching without blind area was realized with matching error less than 0.001%. And furthermore, human errors were avoided and the Lietard mode could be solved quickly. It was shown that the solution accuracy of Lietard model was proportional to the linear correlation of approximate straight line section in the actual drilling leakage characteristics curve. And for the same correlation, new method was faster and more accurate than the chart method.
  • [1] 李大奇,康毅力,曾义金,等.缝洞型储层缝宽动态变化及其对钻井液漏失的影响[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(5):76-81. LI Daqi,KANG Yili,ZENG Yijin,et al.Dynamic variation of fracture width and its effects on drilling fluid lost circulation in fractured vuggy reservoirs[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2011,35(5):76-81.
    [2] 王业众,康毅力,游利军,等.裂缝性储层漏失机理及控制技术进展[J].钻井液与完井液,2007,24(4):74-77. WANG Yezhong,KANG Yili,YOU Lijun,et al.Progresses in mechanism study and control:mud losses to fractured reservoirs[J].Drilling Fluid Completion Fluid,2007,24(4):74-77.
    [3] 蒋海军,鄢捷年.架桥粒子粒径与裂缝有效流动宽度匹配关系的试验研究[J].钻井液与完井液,2000,17(4):1-3,7. JIANG Haijun,YAN Jienian.Laboratory study on the compatibility between the diameter of bridging particles and the effective fracture width[J].Drilling Fluid Completion Fluid,2000,17(4):1-3,7.
    [4]

    LUTHI S M,SOUHAITE P.Fracture apertures from electrical borehole scans[J].Geophysics,1990,55(7):821-833.

    [5]

    HORNBY B E,JOHNSON D L,WINKLER K W,et al.Fracture evaluation using reflected Stoneley-wave arrivals[J].Geophysics,1989,54(10):1274-1288.

    [6]

    LAVROV A.Flow of truncated power-law fluid between parallel walls for hydraulic fracturing applications[J].Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics,2015,223:141-146.

    [7]

    OMOSEBI A O,ADENUGA K A.Pressure drop versus flow rate profiles for power-law and Herschel-Bulkley fluids[R].SPE 162999,2012.

    [8]

    MAJIDI R,MISKA S,ZHANG Jianguo.Fingerprint of mud losses into natural and induced fractures[R].SPE 143854,2011.

    [9]

    LAVROV A,TRONVOLL J.Numerical analysis of radial flow in a natural fracture:applications in drilling performance and reservoir characterization[R].SPE 103564,2006.

    [10]

    LIETARD O,SPIVEY J.Revisiting pressure transient testing of hydraulically fractured wells:a single,simple and exact analytical solution covering bilinear,linear,and transition in between flow regimes[R].SPE 139508,2011.

    [11] 金业权,胡满,吴谦,等.Macondo深水井漏油事故防喷器系统失效原因分析[J].石油钻探技术,2014,42(4):53-58. JIN Yequan,HU Man,WU Qian,et al.Analysis of deepwater BOP failure in the Macondo Well accident[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2014,42(4):53-58.
    [12] 臧艳彬,王瑞和,张锐.川东北地区钻井漏失及堵漏措施现状分析[J].石油钻探技术,2011,39(2):60-64. ZANG Yanbin,WANG Ruihe,ZHANG Rui.Current situation analysis of circulation lost and measures in Northeast Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2011,39(2):60-64.
    [13] 林英松,蒋金宝,秦涛.井漏处理技术的研究及发展[J].断块油气田,2005,12(2):4-7. LIN Yingsong,JIANG Jinbao,QIN Tao.The development of well loss processing technology[J].Fault-Block Oil Gas Field,2005,12(2):4-7.
    [14] 邹德永,赵建,郭玉龙,等.渗透性砂岩地层漏失压力预测模型[J].石油钻探技术,2014,42(1):33-36. ZOU Deyong,ZHAO Jian,GUO Yulong,et al.A model for predicting leak-off pressure in permeable-sandstone formations[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2014,42(1):33-36.
    [15] 刘加杰,钟颖,张浩.利用钻井液漏失资料预测裂缝宽度[J].中国井矿盐,2014,45(3):20-22. LIU Jiajie,ZHONG Ying,ZHANG Hao.Forecast crack width with drilling fluid leakage data[J].China Well and Rock Salt,2014,45(3):20-22.
    [16] 李大奇,康毅力,刘修善,等.裂缝性地层钻井液漏失动力学模型研究进展[J].石油钻探技术,2013,41(4):42-47. LI Daqi,KANG Yili,LIU Xiushan,et al.Progress in drilling fluid loss dynamics model for fractured formations[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2013,41(4):42-47.
    [17]

    LIETARD O,UNWIN T,GUILLOT D,et al.Fracture width LWD and drilling mud/LCM selection guidelines[R].SPE 36832,1996.

    [18]

    VERGA F,CARUGO C,CHELINI V,et al.Detection and characterization of fractures in naturally fractured reservoirs[R].SPE 63266,2000.

    [19]

    GUILLOT D.A digest of rheological equations[J].Developments in Petroleum Science,1990,28:A1-A8.

    [20] 李秀敏,江卫华.相关系数与相关性度量[J].数学的实践与认识,2006,36(12):188-192. LI Xiuming,JIANG Weihua.Research on linear correlation and dependence measure[J].Mathematics in Practice and Theory,2006,36(12):188-192.
    [21] 严丽坤.相关系数与偏相关系数在相关分析中的应用[J].云南财贸学院学报,2003,19(3):78-80. YAN Likun.Application of correlation coefficient and based correlation coefficient in related analysis[J].Journal of Yunnan University of Finance and Economics,2003,19(3):78-80.
  • 期刊类型引用(5)

    1. 冯庆瑞,张景富,朱健军,潘荣山,王建成,张坤. 基于LightGBM算法的地层裂缝宽度预测方法. 能源与环保. 2025(01): 65-72 . 百度学术
    2. 彭浩,李黔,高佳佳,尹虎,陈一凡. 可变形天然裂缝动态宽度流-固耦合计算模型. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(02): 77-86 . 百度学术
    3. 王健,徐加放,赵密福,王博闻,王亚华,陈杰,王潇辉,杨刚,马腾飞. 基于神经网络的钻井液漏失裂缝宽度预测研究. 煤田地质与勘探. 2023(09): 81-88 . 百度学术
    4. 何涛,谢显涛,王君,赵洋,苏俊霖. 利用优化BP神经网络建立裂缝宽度预测模型. 钻井液与完井液. 2021(02): 201-206 . 百度学术
    5. 赵洋,邓明毅,曾文强,肖洛书. Griffiths天然裂缝宽度预测模型研究与分析. 钻采工艺. 2017(05): 102-105+7 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(7)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  2902
  • HTML全文浏览量:  112
  • PDF下载量:  2651
  • 被引次数: 12
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-07-28
  • 修回日期:  2016-03-03
  • 刊出日期:  1899-12-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回