阵列侧向测井曲线极化角影响因素研究

倪小威; 徐观佑; 敖旋峰; 冯加明; 艾林; 刘迪仁

doi:10.11911/syztjs.2018017

阵列侧向测井曲线极化角影响因素研究

倪小威^1,2,
徐观佑^1,2,
敖旋峰^1,2,
冯加明^1,2,
艾林³,
刘迪仁^1,2, ,

1.
油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室(长江大学), 湖北武汉 430100;
2.
长江大学地球物理与石油资源学院, 湖北武汉 430100;
3.
长江大学电子信息学院, 湖北荆州 434023

基金项目:

国家自然科学"地层条件下富有有机质页岩电磁响应机理与应用基础研究"（编号：U1562109）资助。

详细信息

作者简介:
倪小威(1994-),男,湖北荆州人,2016年毕业于长江大学勘查技术与工程专业,地球探测与信息技术专业在读硕士研究生,从事煤层气测井评价及电法测井正反演研究。

通讯作者:
刘迪仁,liudr666@163.com。

中图分类号: P631.8⁺11
计量
- 文章访问数: 1748
- HTML全文浏览量: 94
- PDF下载量: 1872
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-08-08
- 刊出日期: 1899-12-31

The Influencing Factors on the Polarizing Angle of Array Laterolog Curves

NI Xiaowei^1,2,
XU Guanyou^1,2,
AO Xuanfeng^1,2,
FENG Jiaming^1,2,
AI Lin³,
LIU Diren^1,2, ,

1.
MOE Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources(Yangtze University), Wuhan, Hubei, 430100, China;
2.
College of Geophysics and Oil Resources, Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430100, China;
3.
College of Electronic Information, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434023, China

摘要

摘要: 侧向类测井电阻率曲线的极化角对地质构造的解释、地层界面的判断有很大帮助，但也会导致电阻率曲线失真且产生假薄层特征，因此通过正演计算明确影响极化角的因素可以提高油气层评价的准确性。运用三维有限元法建立了层状介质模型，探讨了围岩电阻率、钻井液电阻率、侵入带特性、仪器特性、层厚、井径和井斜角等因素对阵列侧向测井曲线极化角的影响。正演计算表明，目的层电阻率与围岩电阻率的比值大于4时，极化角更加尖锐且幅值急剧增加；钻井液电阻率主要影响极化角的形态，钻井液电阻率越大极化角越尖锐；侵入带对极化角的影响较复杂，要综合考虑侵入带电阻率与侵入深度来判断；仪器探测深度对极化角形态的影响不大，仪器纵向分辨率越高，极化角越平缓且幅值越小；井径越大，极化角越不明显；当地层厚度小于仪器纵向分辨率时，阵列侧向测井曲线极化角消失，随着层厚增大，极化角幅值变大但趋于平缓；当井斜角大于60°时，极化角基本消失，且井斜角越小，极化角越明显。研究结果表明，围岩电阻率、仪器纵向分辨率和层厚对极化角的影响尤其明显，这可为现场正确利用极化角进行油气储层解释提供指导。
- 阵列侧向测井 /
- 极化角 /
- 正演 /
- 有限元法 /
- 影响因素
Abstract: The polarizing angle of a laterolog curve is helpful in the interpretation of geological structures and the assessment of formation interfaces,but the distortion of the resistivity curve and the features of "false thin layers" can also occur.Therefore,it is of great significance for evaluating oil and gas reservoirs to identify the influencing factors of the polarizing angle by using a forward calculation.Three-dimensional finite element numerical simulation is used to set up a layered media model,which facilitates evaluating the influence of a series of factors on polarizing angle characteristics,such as the surrounding rock resistivity,drilling fluid resistivity,invasion zone characteristics,instrument characteristics,layer thickness,well diameter,well angle,etc.The forward calculation results showed that when the ratio of the resistivity of the target rock to that of the surrounding rock is greater than 4,the polarizing angle will be sharper and the amplitude increased rapidly.They also showed that the resistivity of drilling fluid mainly affects the shape of the polarizing angle so that the greater the resistivity of drilling fluid,the sharper the polarizing angle.The influence of invasion zone on the polarizing angle is more complex.Well designers should carefully consider the invasion resistivity and depth.The detection depth of the instrument has little effect on the polarizing angle shape,but the higher the vertical resolution of instrument,the flatter the polarizing angle,and the smaller the amplitude.Further,the bigger the well diameter,the less obvious the polarizing angle is.Revealingly,when the formation thickness is less than the vertical resolution of the instrument,the polarizing angle of the array laterolog disappears.With the increase of formation thickness,the polarization angle becomes larger,and it tends to be flat.However,when the angle of inclination is more than 60°,the polarizing angle basically disappears.Likewise,the smaller the inclination angle,the more obvious the polarizing angle.The research results indicated that the effect of surrounding rock resistivity,instrument vertical resolution,and layer thickness had the most obvious effect on the polarizing angle.This could provide guidance for the correct application of the polarizing angle to interpret oil and gas reservoirs.
- array laterolog /
- polarizing angle /
- forward simulation /
- finite element method /
- influencing factors

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1]	范晓敏.双侧向测井曲线形状与地层侵入关系研究[J].地球物理学进展,2007,22(1):142-146. FAN Xiaomin.Investigation on the relation between form of laterologs and invasion state of reservoir[J].Progress in Geophysics,2007,22(1):142-146.
[2]	范宜仁,巫振观,王磊,等.大斜度井各向异性地层双感应测井响应特征研究[J].测井技术,2016,40(3):262-269,275. FAN Yiren,WU Zhenguan,WANG Lei,et al.Response characteristics of dual induction logging in anisotropic formation and high deviated wells[J].Well Logging Technology,2016,40(3):262-269,275.
[3]	ANDERSON B I,BANNER S,LULING M G,et al.Response of 2-MHz LWD resistivity and wireline induction tools in dipping beds and laminated formations[R].SPWLA-1990-A,1990.
[4]	杨震,范宜仁,文艺,等.三维频率域随钻电磁波测井数值模拟[J].地球物理学进展,2009,24(5):1833-1838. YANG Zhen,FAN Yiren,WEN Yi,et al.Three-dimensional numerical simulation of electromagnetic logging-while-drilling tool response in frequency domain[J].Progress in Geophysics,2009,24(5):1833-1838.
[5]	朱庚雪,刘得军,张颖颖,等.基于hp-FEM的随钻电磁波测井仪器响应正演分析[J].石油钻探技术,2015,43(2):63-70. ZHU Gengxue,LIU Dejun,ZHANG Yingying,et al.Forward modeling of responses of an ELWD tool based on hp-FEM[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2015,43(2):63-70.
[6]	李勇华,杨锦舟,杨震,等.随钻电阻率地层边界响应特征分析及应用[J].石油钻探技术,2016,44(6):111-116. LI Yonghua,YANG Jinzhou,YANG Zhen,et al.The analysis and application of formation interface response characteristics of the resistivity LWD tool[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2016,44(6):111-116.
[7]	WANG T L,SIGNORELLI J.Finite-difference modeling of electromagnetic tool response for logging while drilling[J].Geophysics,2004,69(1):152-160.
[8]	刘迪仁,万文春,夏培,等.不同井眼条件下的水平井双侧向测井响应[J].物探与化探,2012,36(3):422-425. LIU Diren,WAN Wenchun,XIA Pei,et al.The response of dual laterolog to different borehole conditions in the horizontal well[J].Geophysical Geochemical Exploration,2012,36(3):422-425.
[9]	张庚骥.电阻率测井响应的积分方程解法[J].地球物理学报,1985,28(5):519-525. ZHANG Gengji.The response of resistivity logging obtained by solving integral equations[J].Acta Geophysica Sinica,1985,28(5):519-525.
[10]	夏培,刘迪仁,万文春,等.水平井各向异性地层双侧向测井响应数值模拟[J].石油天然气学报,2011,33(8):104-106. XIA Pei,LIU Diren,WAN Wenchun,et al.Numerical simulation of dual laterolog response in anisotropic formation of horizontal wells[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2011,33(8):104-106.
[11]	陈亮.斜井、水平井双侧向测井响应三维有限元数值分析[D].杭州:浙江大学,2008. CHEN Liang.Three dimensional finite element numerical analysis of dual laterolog response in inclined shaft and horizontal well[D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2008.
[12]	仵杰,谢尉尉,解茜草,等.阵列侧向测井仪器的正演响应分析[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2008,23(1):73-76,80. WU Jie,XIE Weiwei,XIE Xicao,et al.Forward response analysis of array lateral logging tool[J].Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2008,23(1):73-76,80.
[13]	刘振华,胡启.阵列侧向测井响应的计算及其特征[J].西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),2002,17(1):53-57. LIU Zhenhua,HU Qi.Calculation and characteristics of array laterlog responses[J].Journal of Xi’an Petroleum Institute(Natural Science Edition),2002,17(1):53-57.
[14]	杨韡.阵列侧向测井的正反演[J].勘探地球物理进展,2003,26(4):305-308. YANG Wei.Forward and backward in array lateral logging[J].Progress in Exploration Geophysics,2003,26(4):305-308.
[15]	柳杰.电流势法在直流电测井模拟中的应用[D].杭州:浙江大学,2015. LIU Jie.Application of current potential method in DC electrical logging[D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2015.

施引文献(7)

期刊类型引用(4)

1.	赵莹杰，黄静雅，刘海飞，柳建新，刘昕. 轴对称连续电性模型激电测井二维有限元数值模拟. 物探化探计算技术. 2024(04): 434-445 . 百度学术
2.	谢关宝，李永杰，吴海燕，黎有炎. 近井眼洞穴型地层双侧向测井敏感因素分析. 石油钻探技术. 2020(01): 120-126 . 本站查看
3.	冯进，倪小威，杨清，管耀，刘迪仁. 基于混合模拟退火算法的阵列侧向测井实时反演研究. 石油钻探技术. 2019(05): 121-126 . 本站查看
4.	倪小威，徐思慧，别康，冯加明，徐观佑，刘迪仁. 不同井眼偏心距下水平井阵列侧向测井围岩校正研究. 石油钻探技术. 2018(04): 121-126 . 本站查看