国际石油公司页岩气开发技术策略分析与展望

苏珊·史密斯·纳什

苏珊·史密斯·纳什. 国际石油公司页岩气开发技术策略分析与展望[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2014, 42(5): 1-8. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201405001
引用本文: 苏珊·史密斯·纳什. 国际石油公司页岩气开发技术策略分析与展望[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2014, 42(5): 1-8. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201405001
Susan Smith Nash. An Analysis and Outlook of Technology Strategy for Shale Plays:Independents vs.Majors[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2014, 42(5): 1-8. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201405001
Citation: Susan Smith Nash. An Analysis and Outlook of Technology Strategy for Shale Plays:Independents vs.Majors[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2014, 42(5): 1-8. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201405001

国际石油公司页岩气开发技术策略分析与展望

详细信息
    作者简介:

    苏珊·史密斯·纳什(1958—),女,1981年毕业于俄克拉荷马大学地质专业,1989年获俄克拉荷马大学英文专业(英语写作、文化、世界历史)硕士学位,1996年获俄克拉荷马大学英文专业(修辞和文学)博士学位,AAPG培训和职业发展促进部经理。

  • 中图分类号: TE37

An Analysis and Outlook of Technology Strategy for Shale Plays:Independents vs.Majors

  • 摘要: 在页岩气开发早期,起主导作用的是中型独立石油公司,尽管某些大型石油公司也较早地参与了页岩气的开发,但取得的成果很差。为此,研究了独立和大型石油天然气公司所采用的页岩气开发技术策略,分析了其成功或失败的原因,并根据已开发的和新的页岩区块的图表数据及其理想的开发技术策略,认为将来在页岩气储层描述、甜点识别、钻井完井和增产措施优化方面也会有重大进展。
    Abstract: The early influencers and leaders in shale plays were,most notably,medium-sized independents,Consequently,the majors who participated relatively early in the development of shale plays had very mixed results.This report examines the strategies for exploring for and developing shale plays as implemented by independents and by major oil and gas companies.It finds explanations for comparative success and failure,and charts and ideal strategy for both established and new/frontier shale plays.There will undoubtedly be improvements in the characterization of reservoirs,identification of sweet spots,as well as optimized drilling,completion,and stimulation.
  • [2]

    Credit Suisse.The Shale Revolution:I[EB/OL].[2014-09-15].https://doc.research-and-analytics.csfb.com/docView?language=ENGformat=PDFdocument-id=1005321471source-id=emextdocid=1005321471-1-ENG-pdfserialid=0sD72ky5PVE69YdSxRIsei9L5gnDVssxzgAuLedlEiQ%3d.

    [3]

    Credit Suisse.The Shale Revolution:II[EB/OL].[2014-09-15].https://doc.research-and-analytics.csfb.com/docView?language=ENGsource=emfromsendlinkformat=PDFdocument-id=1023125461extdocid=1023125461-1-eng-pdfserialid=9EIFh5wGMbrXUOFyyhvTsJLi%2fxb2aKN9Saj95oKCxko%3d.

    [4]

    Ambrose R J,Clarkson C R,Youngblood J,et al.Life-cycle decline curve estimation for tight/shale gas reservoirs[R].SPE 140519,2011.

    [5]

    Clarkson C R.Production data analysis of unconventional gas wells:review of theory and best practices[J].Int.J.Coal Geology,2013,109/110(4):101-146.

    [6]

    Ozkan E,Brown M L,Raghavan R S,et al.Comparison of fractured horizontal-well performance in conventional and unconventional reservoirs[R].SPE 121290,2009.

    [7]

    Samandarli O,Al-Ahmadi H A,Wattenbarger R A.A new method for history matching and forecasting shale gas reservoir production performance with a dual porosity model[R].SPE 144335,2011.

    [8]

    Clarkson C R,Solanoa N,Bustin R M,et al.Pore structure characterization of North American shale gas reservoirs using USANS/SANS,gas absorption,and mercury intrusion[J].Fuel,2013,103(2):606-616.

    [9]

    Perry K,Lee J.Unconventional gas reservoirs-tight gas,coal seams,and shales[R].Washington D C:National Petroleum Council,2007.

    [10]

    Leyva I,Yazdi M M,Murdoch G.Formation X reservoir characterization project[D].Calgary:University of Calgary,Department of Chemical Petroleum Engineering,2010.

    [11]

    Nobakht M,Ambrose R,Clarkson C R.Effect of heterogeneity in a horizontal well with multiple fractures on the long-term forecast in shale gas reservoirs[R].SPE 149400,2011.

    [12]

    Xu Wenyue,Theircelin M J,Walton I C.Characterization of hydraulically induced shale fracture network using a semi-analytical model[R].SPE 124697,2009.

    [13]

    Williams-Kovacs J D,Clarkson C R.A new tool for prospect evaluation in shale gas reservoirs[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2014,18(5):90-103.

    [14]

    Fraim M L.Gas reservoir decline-curve analysis using type curves with real gas pseudopressure and normalized time[J].SPE Formation Evaluation,1987:2(4):671-682.

    [15]

    Kuuskra V A,Stevens S H.Worldwide gas shales and unconventional gas:a status report:Advanced Resources International,INC.,Copenhagen,Denmark,December 12,2009[C].

    [16]

    Williams-Kovacs J D,Clarkson C R.Using stochastic simulation to quantify risk and uncertainty in prospect screening and development[R].SPE 148867,2011.

    [17]

    Clarkson C R,Beierle J J.Integration of microseismic and other post-fracture surveillance with production analysis:a tight gas case study[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2011,3(2):382-401.

    [18]

    Clarkson C R,Pedersen P K.Tight oil production analysis:adaptation of existing rate-transient analysis techniques[R].SPE 137352,2010.

  • 期刊类型引用(3)

    1. 龚月,高和群,李小越,邵林. 四川盆地及周缘页岩气赋存方式展布特征研究. 非常规油气. 2023(02): 49-56 . 百度学术
    2. 阳晓燕,雷源,马栋,王龙,温慧芸. 一种动态储量计算新方法在渤海油田的应用. 断块油气田. 2019(03): 329-332 . 百度学术
    3. 廖勇,谭判,石文睿,冯爱国,何浩然. 涪陵页岩气储层产气性评价方法. 石油钻探技术. 2018(05): 69-75 . 本站查看

    其他类型引用(0)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  3204
  • HTML全文浏览量:  85
  • PDF下载量:  4335
  • 被引次数: 3
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-04-23
  • 修回日期:  2014-08-26
  • 刊出日期:  1899-12-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回