玛湖油田玛18井区体积压裂对钻井作业干扰问题的探讨

田林海; 屈刚; 雷鸣; 于德成; 张伟

doi:10.11911/syztjs.2019023

玛湖油田玛18井区体积压裂对钻井作业干扰问题的探讨

1.
中国石油西部钻探工程有限公司克拉玛依钻井公司，新疆克拉玛依 834009
2.
中国石油西部钻探工程有限公司工程技术处，新疆乌鲁木齐 830011
3.
中国石油集团油田技术服务有限公司，北京 100027

详细信息

作者简介:
田林海（1976－），男，江苏淮安人，1998年毕业于新疆石油学院石油工程专业，高级工程师，主要从事钻井工程研究和现场管理工作。E-mail: tianlh2007@cnpc.com.cn

中图分类号: TE243⁺.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 11919
- HTML全文浏览量: 6154
- PDF下载量: 75
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-11-10
- 修回日期: 2018-12-24
- 网络出版日期: 2019-01-08
- 刊出日期: 2018-12-31

Discussion of Frac Interferences during Volumetric Fracturing in Drilling Operation of Ma 18 Well Area in Mahu Oilfield

1.
Kelamayi Drilling Company, CNPC Xibu Drilling Engineering Company Limited, Kelamayi, Xinjiang, 834009, China
2.
Engineering and Technical Department, CNPC Xibu Drilling Engineering Company Limited, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830011, China
3.
CNPC Oilfield Technology Service Company, Beijing, 100027, China

摘要

摘要:
玛湖油田玛18井区油井进行体积压裂后，相邻中深水平井三开钻进时出现井下复杂情况的次数增多，为了分析其原因并解决该问题，分析探讨了体积压裂对钻井作业干扰的问题。从复杂情况类型、处置案例、阶段性防控技术修正等方面入手，结合该井区中深水平井三开井段钻遇地层的地质特性，分析了受体积压裂影响正钻井发生井下复杂情况的主要原因：受体积压裂影响，侏罗系与三叠系地层交接处形成了窜漏点，导致在此处易出现井漏、溢流等井下复杂情况；斜井段与水平段的泥岩井段易出现井眼失稳和垮塌。对此，提出了针对体积压裂所造成的动态窜漏以及定向井段、水平井段泥岩地层井眼失稳的处理措施。研究认为，玛18井区中深水平井三开钻进防控体积压裂造成井下复杂情况的要点，是做好裸眼井段窜漏点封堵与泥岩段井壁的支撑工作，可为玛湖油田同类型水平井钻井提供借鉴。
- 体积压裂 /
- 水平井 /
- 钻井 /
- 干扰 /
- 井下故障 /
- 玛18井区 /
- 玛湖油田
Abstract:
The goal of this study is to solve the problem of frac interference in an area with many downhole complexities. After volumetric fracturing in Ma 18 well area of Mahu Oilfield, numerous downhole complexities were experienced in the third spud section drilling of middle-deep horizontal wells. In order to analyze the causes and solve the problems, the interferences of volumetric fracturing in drilling operation have been analyzed. From perspectives of complicated event, disposal cases, and phased prevention and control technical modification, combined with geological characteristics of different strata in the open-hole section of the middle-deep horizontal wells in this area, the main reasons leading to drilling complexities under the influence of volumetric fracturing were analyzed.Due to the influence of volumetric fracturing, leakage points were formed at the junction of the Jurassic and Triassic strata, which led to complex phenomena such as lost circulation and overflow The mudstone intervals in the deviated and horizontal sections were prone to wellbore instability and collapsing. Hence, the countermeasures for the dynamic leakage caused by volumetric fracturing, and the wellbore instability in the mudstone intervals of directional and horizontal sections were proposed. According to the research, during the third spud section drilling of middle-deep horizontal wells in the Ma 18 well area, the key elements for controlling the downhole complexities caused by volumetric fracturing were a consequences of plugging the leakage points in the open hole section, and supporting the wellbore in the mudstone intervals. These countermeasures could provide reference for drilling the same type of horizontal wells in Mahu Oilfield.
- volume fracturing /
- horizontal well /
- drilling /
- interference /
- downholecomplexity /
- Ma18 Block /
- Mahu Oilfield

HTML全文

表 1 玛18井区中深水平井钻遇地层压力系数分布

Table 1 Distribution of formation pressure coefficient in medium-deep horizontal wells of Ma 18 well area

井段/m	层位	地层压力系数
0～3 200.00	吐谷鲁群组—白碱滩组	1.07
3 200.00～3 898.00	白碱滩组—百口泉组1段	1.40
3 898.00～3 941.00	百口泉组1段	1.60

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 玛18井区中深水平井井身结构

Table 2 Casing program of medium-deep horizontal wells of Ma 18 well area

开钻次序	井深/ m	钻头直径/ mm	套管直径/ mm	套管下入地层层位
一开	500.00	381.0	273.1	吐谷鲁群组
二开	3 140.00	241.3	193.7	白碱滩组
三开	5 800.00	165.1	127.0	百口泉组

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2016年10月—2017年4月玛18井区已完钻中深水平井情况

Table 3 Statistics on the drilled medium- deep horizontal wells in Ma 18 well area from October 2016 to April 2017

井号	钻井周期/ d	完钻井深/ m	平均机械钻速/ （m·h^–1）	井下故障时率，%
MaHW6107	96.75	5 290.00	10.45	0
MaHW6009	86.79	5 501.00	7.80	0
MaHW6116	108.75	5 844.00	7.84	0.2
MaHW6112	104.67	5 322.00	5.82	0
MaHW6014	111.46	6 008.00	5.84	0.2
MaHW6137	93.71	5 214.00	6.97	0.3

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 玛18井区部分中深水平井的封堵情况

Table 4 Plugging of partial medium-deep horizontal wells in Ma 18 well area

井号	窜漏井段/ m	桥堵次数	水泥封堵次数	损失时间/ d
MaHW6123	4 044.00～4 047.00	8		28
MaHW6008	3 441.00～3 448.00	6	3	38
MaHW6006	3 400.00～4 059.00	0	3	16
MaHW6207	3 300.00～4 434.00	0	2	7
MaHW6130	3 088.00～3 195.00	1	4	15

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(8)

[1]	支东明. 玛湖凹陷百口泉组准连续型高效油藏的发现与成藏机制[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2016, 37(4): 373–382 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xjsydz201604001 ZHI Dongming. Discovery and hydrocarbon accumulation mech-anism of quasi-continuous high-efficiency reservoirs of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37(4): 373–382 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xjsydz201604001
[2]	雷德文, 陈刚强, 刘海磊, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷大油(气)区形成条件与勘探方向研究[J]. 地质学报, 2017, 91(7): 1604–1619 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2017.07.012 LEI Dewen, CHEN Gangqiang, LIU Hailei, et al. Study on the forming conditions and exploration fields of the Mahu giant oil (gas) province, Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91(7): 1604–1619 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2017.07.012
[3]	翁定为, 付海峰, 卢拥军, 等. 储层改造体积预测模型的研究与应用[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2016, 44(1): 95–100 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syztjs201601023 WENG Dingwei, FU Haifeng, LU Yongjun, et al. A model for predicting the volume of stimulated reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(1): 95–100 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syztjs201601023
[4]	何新星, 李皋, 段慕白, 等. 地层裂缝动态变形对堵漏效果的影响研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2018, 46(4): 65–70 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syztjs201804011 HE Xinxing, LI Gao, DUAN Mubai, et al. The influence of dynamic deformation of formation fractures on the plugging effect[J]. Pet-roleum Drilling Techniques, 2018, 46(4): 65–70 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syztjs201804011
[5]	韩来聚, 牛洪波, 窦玉玲. 胜利低渗油田长水平段水平井钻井关键技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2012, 40(3): 7–12 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2012.03.002 HAN Laiju, NIU Hongbo, DOU Yuling. Key drilling technologies for long displacement horizontal wells of low permeability reservoirs in Shengli Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2012, 40(3): 7–12 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2012.03.002
[6]	韩来聚, 牛洪波. 对长水平段水平井钻井技术的几点认识[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2014, 42(2): 7–11 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syztjs201402002 HAN Laiju, NIU Hongbo. Understandings on drilling technology for long horizontal section wells[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2014, 42(2): 7–11 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syztjs201402002
[7]	闫丰明, 康毅力, 孙凯, 等. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩储层暂堵性堵漏配方研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2012, 40(1): 47–51 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2012.01.010 YAN Fengming, KANG Yili, SUN Kai, et al. The temporary sealing formula for fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoir[J]. Petroleum Drill-ing Techniques, 2012, 40(1): 47–51 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2012.01.010
[8]	穆海朋, 马开华, 丁士东. 封固海相易漏层的抗高压低密水泥浆体系研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2011, 39(1): 56–60 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2011.01.013 MU Haipeng, MA Kaihua, DING Shidong. Research on low density cement slurry for cementing marine thief zone[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2011, 39(1): 56–60 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2011.01.013

施引文献(12)

期刊类型引用(9)

1.	周芳芳，于雷涛. 凝胶堵漏颗粒的合成及性能评价. 石油化工应用. 2025(01): 110-112+120 . 百度学术
2.	艾昆，王超，王西江，张军义，董强伟，梅津滔. 适用裂缝性漏失的弹性捕集孔网桥接剂性能评价研究. 钻采工艺. 2025(02): 32-40 . 百度学术
3.	侯华丹，于雷. 基于弹性网眼体的油基钻井液堵漏体系研究与应用. 海洋石油. 2023(01): 55-58 . 百度学术
4.	王野. 复杂地质条件下弹性孔网材料堵漏性能研究. 西部资源. 2023(03): 192-194 . 百度学术
5.	于雷，李公让，王宝田，张高峰，张守文，明玉广. 一种新型亲油纤维堵漏剂的研发. 天然气工业. 2023(06): 112-118 . 百度学术
6.	孙欢，朱明明，王伟良，李治君，陈宁，刘斌. 长庆页岩油水平井华H90-3井超长水平段防漏堵漏技术. 石油钻探技术. 2022(02): 16-21 . 本站查看
7.	李科，贾江鸿，于雷，李海斌. 页岩油钻井漏失机理及防漏堵漏技术. 钻井液与完井液. 2022(04): 446-450 . 百度学术
8.	庄艳君，肖林通，于雷，邱春阳. 丁页10井水平井钻井液技术. 四川化工. 2022(06): 37-40 . 百度学术
9.	周双君，朱立鑫，杨森，毛俊，李萧杰，黄维安. 吉木萨尔页岩油区块防漏堵漏技术. 石油钻探技术. 2021(04): 66-70 . 本站查看