Experimental Study on Drill Pipe Stress-Fatigue Life Curve
-
摘要: 钻杆的疲劳失效是引发钻井井下事故的主要原因,因此有必要对钻杆的应力-疲劳寿命曲线进行试验研究。采用旋转弯曲疲劳试验机,研究了常用的S135和G105钻杆的疲劳性能;采用疲劳寿命对数正态分布模型,得出了任意存活率对应的应力-疲劳寿命曲线;采用直接外推法和2m-1外推法将疲劳曲线延伸到长寿命区域,并将其外推结果与配对升降法试验结果进行了对比。升降法试验得出S135和G105钻杆的疲劳强度(存活率为99%,置信度为95%)分别为550.19 MPa和454.79 MPa;由直接外推存活率99%的曲线得到疲劳寿命为1.0×107时,S135和G105钻杆对应强度分别为510.23 MPa和402.01 MPa;由2m-1外推法外推存活率99%的曲线得到疲劳寿命为1.0×107时,S135和G105钻杆对应强度分别为532.95 MPa和428.98 MPa。试验表明,2种外推方法得到的疲劳强度均低于试验值,2m-1 外推法得到的疲劳强度值更接近升降法试验值,因此推荐使用2m-1外推法对概率-应力-疲劳寿命曲线进行外推来得到完整的疲劳寿命曲线。Abstract: Drill pipe failure due to fatigue is the main cause of the oilfield drilling accidents, so it is necessary to study the stress-fatigue life curves of drill pipes. The fatigue performances of S135 and G105 drill pipe materials were studied by using the rotating bending fatigue testing machine. The logarithmic normal distribution model was adopted to obtain the stress-fatigue life curves corresponding to any survival rates. The direct extrapolation and 2m-1 index method were adopted to extend the fatigue curve into long-life area and the extrapolated fatigue results were compared with the up-and-down method results. The up-and-down method showed that the fatigue strengths of S135 and G105 drill pipes (survival rate was 99% and confidence level was 95%) were 550.19 MPa and 454.79 MPa respectively. The corresponding strengths of drill pipes S135 and G105 were 510.23 MPa and 402.01 MPa respectively when the fatigue life obtained by the curve with direct extrapolation survival rate of 99% was 1.0×107, while the 2m-1 method showed that when the curve of survival rate 99% obtained a fatigue life of 1.0×107, the drill pipe strengths were 532.95 MPa and 428.98 MPa respectively. The tests turned out that the fatigue strengths extrapolated by these two methods were both less than the test values. The fatigue strength value measured by the 2m-1 index method was closer to the test value by up-and-down method, so the 2m-1 index method was recommended to extrapolate the probability-stress-fatigue life curves so that a complete fatigue life curve could be obtained.
-
Keywords:
- drill pipe /
- fatigue test /
- fatigue strength /
- stress /
- fatigue life /
- extrapolation
-
-
[1] 刘志超,冯爽,姚久红,等.钻杆的失效分析和检测现状及其研究进展[J].热加工工艺,2015,44(6):8-11. Liu Zhichao,Feng Shuang,Yao Jiuhong,et al. Reaserch progress and detection current status and progress of drill pipe failure[J].Hot Working Technology,2015,44(6):8-11. [2] 刘永刚,陈绍安,李齐富,等.复杂深井钻具失效研究[J].石油矿场机械,2010,39(9):13-16. Liu Yonggang,Chen Shaoan, Li Qifu,et al. Study on failure drill string in complex deep well[J]. Oil Field Equipment,2010,39(9):13-16. [3] 万里平,孟英峰,杨龙,等.钻柱失效原因及预防措施[J]. 钻采工艺,2006,29(1):57-59. Wan Liping,Meng Yingfeng,Yang Long,et al. Failure cause and preventive measures of drill stem[J].Drilling Production Technology,2006,29(1):57-59. [4] 王文龙,赵勤,李子丰,等.普光气田气体钻井钻具失效原因分析及预防措施[J].石油钻采工艺,2008,30(5):38-43. Wang Wenlong,Zhao Qin,Li Zifeng,et al. Cause analysis and precautions of drilling tools failure during gas drilling in Puguang Gas Field[J]. Oil Drilling Production Technology,2008,30(5):38-43. [5] 林元华,罗宏志,邹波,等.钻柱失效机理及其疲劳寿命预测研究[J].石油钻采工艺,2004,26(1):19-22. Lin Yuanhua,Luo Hongzhi,Zou Bo,et al. Research on the failure mechanism and fatigue life predication of drill pipe[J].Oil Drilling Production Technology,2004,26(1):19-22. [6] 吕拴录,倪渊诠,杨成新,等. 某油田钻具失效统计分析[J]. 理化检验,2012,48(6):414-418. Lv Shuanlu,Ni Yuanquan,Yang Chengxin,et al.Statistic analysis on drilling tools failure in one oil field[J]. Physical Testing and Chenmical Analysis,2012,48(6):414-418. [7] Lv Shuanlu,Feng Yaorong,Luo Faqian,et al. Failure analysis of IEU drill pipe wash out[J]. International Journal of Fatigue,2005,27(10/11/12):1360-1365.
[8] Ziomek-Moroz M. Environmentally assisted cracking of drill pipes in deep drilling oil and natural gas wells[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance,2012,21(6):1061-1069.
[9] Kohout J,Vechet S. A new function for fatigue curves characterization and its multiple merits[J]. International Journal of Fatigue,2001,23(2):175-183.
[10] GB/T 4337—2008 金属材料 疲劳试验 旋转弯曲方法[S]. GB/T 4337—2008 Metallic materials-fatigue testing-rotating bar bending method[S]. [11] 陈传尧.疲劳与断裂[M]. 武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2001:47-54. Chen Chuanyao. Fatigue and fracture[M]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science Technology Press,2001:47-54. [12] 王强,赵永翔,王欢.铁路D1车轮钢的疲劳可靠性寿命与强度的试验及表征[J].机械工程学报,2014,50(14):50-55. Wang Qiang,Zhao Yongxiang,Wang Huan. Experiments and characterization on the probabilistic fatigue lives and strengths of D1 railway wheel steel[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2014,50(14):50-55. [13] 杨冰,赵永翔,邬平波,等.16MnR钢焊接头的延拓概率疲劳S-N曲线[J].交通运输工程学报,2004,4(4):25-29. Yang Bing,Zhao Yongxiang,Wu Pingbo,et al. Extrapolation of probabilistic fatigue S-N curves on 16MnR steel weld joint[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,2004,4(4):25-29. -
期刊类型引用(33)
1. 肖沣峰，杨丽丽，吴家乐，冯尚江，邱士鑫，蒋官澄. 蓖麻油基环保水性聚氨酯成膜剂CWPU. 钻井液与完井液. 2025(02): 201-208 . 
百度学术
2. 宋瀚轩，叶艳，郑连杰，孙振玮，周童，张謦文. 钻井液微纳米封堵性能评价方法研究进展. 应用化工. 2024(02): 383-385 . 百度学术
3. 李成，李伟，王波，张文哲，李锦锋，王军，常世豪. 微纳米孔缝封堵评价方法研究进展与展望. 科技通报. 2023(01): 18-24+31 . 百度学术
4. 孙志刚，李骏函，孙明杰，张茂稳，王立锋. 梨树断陷致密承压封堵钻井液技术研究. 广州化工. 2023(04): 186-188 . 百度学术
5. 李雨洋. 钻井液封堵性能对泥页岩井壁稳定的影响研究. 石化技术. 2023(05): 148-150 . 百度学术
6. 侯杰，谷玉堂，刘兴君，李浩东，李细鸿. 太阳页岩气田海坝区块安全钻进钻井液技术. 采油工程. 2023(01): 44-49+84 . 百度学术
7. 尹家峰，王晓军，鲁政权，步文洋，孙磊，景烨琦，孙云超，闻丽. 辽河大民屯凹陷页岩油储层强封堵恒流变油基钻井液技术. 特种油气藏. 2023(04): 163-168 . 百度学术
8. 付毓伟，罗兵，叶政蔚，肖鹏. 水基钻井液用泥页岩抑制剂研究探讨. 石化技术. 2023(11): 177-179 . 百度学术
9. 潘永强，张坤，于兴东，王洪月，陈赓，李浩东. 松辽盆地致密油水平井提速技术研究与应用. 石油工业技术监督. 2023(12): 33-38 . 百度学术
10. 侯杰，尹华洲，刘兴君，杨斯超. 钻采工程钻井液概算编制方法优化设计. 采油工程. 2023(04): 62-64+76 . 百度学术
11. 司西强，王中华，吴柏志. 中国页岩油气水平井水基钻井液技术现状及发展趋势. 精细石油化工进展. 2022(01): 42-50 . 百度学术
12. 徐志勇. 高性能水基钻井液技术研究进展. 西部探矿工程. 2022(05): 76-77+79 . 百度学术
13. 崔磊，董明，石昌森，郭金玉，李艳军，李英武. 高性能仿油基钻井液在L26-PX井的应用. 西部探矿工程. 2022(07): 68-69+73 . 百度学术
14. 何剑平. 水基钻井液用泥页岩抑制剂研究现状. 西部探矿工程. 2022(08): 83-84+87 . 百度学术
15. 徐浩，谢鑫，唐玉华，王媛媛，金晶. 疏水型高性能水基钻井液在YC1侧水平井中的应用研究. 精细石油化工进展. 2022(04): 6-10 . 百度学术
16. 施连海，李春吉. 威HX-4井水平段钻进技术研究与应用. 辽宁化工. 2022(11): 1647-1649+1653 . 百度学术
17. 殷柏涛. 大庆油田致密油藏钻井液技术发展历程. 西部探矿工程. 2022(10): 103-105+108 . 百度学术
18. 王伟吉. 基于石墨烯修饰的超低渗透成膜剂制备及性能评价. 石油钻探技术. 2021(01): 59-66 . 本站查看
19. 盛勇，叶艳，朱金智，宋瀚轩，张震，周广旭，王涛. 内核纳米乳液用于塔西南地区钻井液的优化. 钻井液与完井液. 2021(02): 170-175 . 百度学术
20. 侯杰，李浩东，于兴东，杨决算. 松辽盆地陆相致密油井壁失稳机理及钻井液对策. 钻井液与完井液. 2021(05): 598-604 . 百度学术
21. 李发华. 大庆油田中浅层水平井水基钻井液技术研究与应用. 西部探矿工程. 2020(03): 121-124 . 百度学术
22. 荣鹏飞. 高性能钻井液技术在大庆QP-X5井中的应用. 西部探矿工程. 2020(03): 71-73 . 百度学术
23. 王晓军，白冬青，孙云超，李晨光，鲁政权，景烨琦，刘畅，蒋立洲. 页岩气井强化封堵全油基钻井液体系——以长宁—威远国家级页岩气示范区威远区块为例. 天然气工业. 2020(06): 107-114 . 百度学术
24. 左富银，苏俊霖，李立宗，赵洋，曾意晴. 有机纳米封堵剂的研究现状及存在问题分析. 化学世界. 2020(11): 733-737 . 百度学术
25. 左富银，苏俊霖，黄进军，李立宗，赵洋，秦祖海. 泥页岩微裂缝微观封堵模拟. 化学世界. 2020(12): 822-828 . 百度学术
26. 高锐. 大庆油田致密油藏开发钻井提速技术浅析. 石油工业技术监督. 2019(01): 54-57 . 百度学术
27. 曾文韬，许明标，由福昌. 泥页岩纳—微米微孔隙封堵评价方法. 能源与环保. 2019(03): 73-76+160 . 百度学术
28. 刘卫东，朱晓虎，蒋文海，樊萍，王悦和，都炳锋. 页岩微裂缝模拟实验评价. 钻采工艺. 2019(02): 104-107+7 . 百度学术
29. 苗立生. 强抑制强封堵水基钻井液在大庆致密油藏的应用. 西部探矿工程. 2019(06): 93-96 . 百度学术
30. 吴迪. 超低压地层防漏堵漏技术研究与应用. 西部探矿工程. 2019(06): 103-106 . 百度学术
31. 张仁彪. 大庆中浅层低成本水基钻井液技术研究与应用. 石油石化节能. 2019(07): 11-14+2 . 百度学术
32. 刘永贵. 大庆致密油藏水平井高性能水基钻井液优化与应用. 石油钻探技术. 2018(05): 35-39 . 本站查看
33. 杨丽，唐清明，兰林，夏海英，牛静，黄璜. 一种页岩封堵性评价测试方法. 钻井液与完井液. 2018(05): 50-54 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(7)
计量
- 文章访问数: 3189
- HTML全文浏览量: 105
- PDF下载量: 3916
- 被引次数: 40
下载:
