泾河油田连续油管水力喷砂射孔环空多簇压裂技术

陈路原

陈路原. 泾河油田连续油管水力喷砂射孔环空多簇压裂技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2015, 43(4): 108-112. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201504019
引用本文: 陈路原. 泾河油田连续油管水力喷砂射孔环空多簇压裂技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2015, 43(4): 108-112. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201504019
Chen Luyuan. Technology of Hydraulic Sand Blasting Perforation and Multiple Clusters Fracturing with Coiled Tubing in Jinghe Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2015, 43(4): 108-112. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201504019
Citation: Chen Luyuan. Technology of Hydraulic Sand Blasting Perforation and Multiple Clusters Fracturing with Coiled Tubing in Jinghe Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2015, 43(4): 108-112. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201504019

泾河油田连续油管水力喷砂射孔环空多簇压裂技术

基金项目: 

中国石化科技攻关项目"致密砂岩油藏有效开采关键技术应用研究"(编号:P14076-1)部分研究内容。

详细信息
    作者简介:

    陈路原(1962—),男,四川攀枝花人,1983年毕业于西南石油学院石油地质勘探专业,2002年获西南石油学院博士学位,高级工程师,主要从事水平井钻采工程研究与技术管理工作。

  • 中图分类号: TE357.3

Technology of Hydraulic Sand Blasting Perforation and Multiple Clusters Fracturing with Coiled Tubing in Jinghe Oilfield

  • 摘要: 针对泾河油田长8油藏水平井压后初期产量低且递减快的问题,根据连续油管水力喷砂射孔环空多簇压裂的技术原理,结合压裂裂缝诱导应力场分析,对簇间距、射孔参数和施工参数进行了优化,形成了泾河油田长8油藏连续油管水力喷砂射孔环空多簇压裂施工方案:压裂簇间距15~38 m,射孔位置距离天然裂缝5~10 m,射孔喷射速度大于190 m/s,压裂施工排量4~5 m3/min,前置液比例28%~32%,段加砂量25~45 m3,平均砂比25.5%~27.0%。该技术在9口井进行了现场应用,与优化前相比,一次压开成功率提高39.3%;与单簇压裂相比,平均单井产量提高3.5 t/d。应用结果表明,连续油管水力喷砂射孔环空多簇压裂技术能实现低孔、特低渗砂岩油藏的有效开发,具备推广应用价值。
    Abstract: To solve the problem of low primary production and quick decline of horizontal wells after hydraulic fracturing in Chang 8 Formation of Jinghe Reservoir, coiled tubing hydraulic sand blasting perforation and multiple clusters fracturing technique was proposed. Through the analysis of this techniques characteristics, the optimization of cluster spacing, perforation and treatment parameters were optimized. Based on the optimum treatment design, we set cluster spacing to 15-38 m, pad ratio 28%-32%, sand plug 25-45 m3, average sand ratio 25.5%-27%. This technique has been put in 9 wells design and it showed that treatment success rate had increase 39.3% and single well production increased 3.5 tons per day. Through the application, it demonstrated that coiled tubing hydraulic sand blasting perforation, and multiple clusters fracturing technique is effective in the development of sandstone reservoirs with low porosity, low permeability.
  • [1] 丁晓琪,张哨楠,谢世文,等.镇泾地区长8段致密低渗透油藏主控因素分析[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2011,33(1):25-30. Ding Xiaoqi,Zhang Shaonan,Xie Shiwen,et al.Main controlling factors analysis of low permeable tight reservoirs of Chang 8 Formation in Zhenjing Area[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science Technology Edition,2011,33(1):25-30.
    [2] 侯瑞云,柳林旺.镇泾油田长8油层组特低渗岩性油藏成藏机制研究[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(4):378-383. Hou Ruiyun,Liu Linwang.Accumulation mechanism of lithologic reservoir with ultra-low permeability in Chang 8 Oil Formation,Zhenjing Oil Field[J].Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2011,33(4):378-383.
    [3] 姚昌宇,王迁伟,高志军,等.连续油管带底封分段压裂技术在泾河油田的应用[J].石油钻采工艺,2014,36(1):94-96. Yao Changyu,Wang Qianwei,Gao Zhijun,et al.Application of sectional fracturing technique with coiled tubing and bottom packer in Jinghe Oilifeld[J].Oil Drilling Production Technology,2014,36(1):94-96.
    [4] 李雷,徐兵威,何青,等. 致密砂岩气藏水平井多簇分段压裂工艺[J].断块油气田,2014,21(3):398-400. Li Lei,Xu Bingwei,He Qing,et al. Multi-cluster staged fracturing technology for horizontal well in tight sandstone gas reservoirs[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2014,21(3):398-400.
    [5] 尹建,郭建春,曾凡辉.水平井分段压裂射孔间距优化方法[J].石油钻探技术,2012,40(5):67-71. Yin Jian,Guo Jianchun,Zeng Fanhui.Perforation spacing optimization for staged fracturing of horizontal well[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2012,40(5):67-71.
    [6] 董光,邓金根,朱海燕,等.重复压裂前的地应力场分析[J].断块油气田,2012,19(4):485-488,492. Dong Guang,Deng Jingen,Zhu Haiyan,et al.Analysis of stress field before refracture treatment[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2012,19(4):485-488,492.
    [7] 李宪文,赵振峰,付钢旦,等.水力喷砂射孔孔道形态研究[J].石油钻采工艺,2012,34(2):55-58. Li Xianwen,Zhao Zhenfeng,Fu Gangdan,et al.Research on Channel pattern of hydraulic sand blasting perforation[J].Oil Drilling Production Technology,2012,34(2):55-58.
    [8] 吴春方,陈作,刘建坤,等. 煤层气U形井水力喷砂压裂技术[J].石油钻探技术,2013,41(4):105-109. Wu Chunfang,Chen Zuo,Liu Jiankun,et al. Hydrajet fracturing technology of u-shape coal bed methane wells[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2013,41(4):105-109.
    [9] 田守嶒,李根生,黄中伟,等.水力喷射压裂机理与技术研究进展[J].石油钻采工艺,2008,30(1):58-62. Tian Shouceng,Li Gensheng,Huang Zhongwei,et al.Research on hydraulijet fracturing mechanisms and technologies[J].Oil Drilling Production Technology,2008,30(1):58-62.
    [10] 黄中伟,李根生,唐志军,等.水力喷射侧钻径向微小井眼技术[J].石油钻探技术,2013,41(4):37-41. Huang Zhongwei,Li Gensheng,Tang Zhijun,et al.Technology of hydra-jet sidetracking of horizontal micro-radial laterals[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2013,41(4):37-41.
  • 期刊类型引用(11)

    1. 董黎明,崔海林,祝靖. 抗高温解堵完井液技术研究. 能源化工. 2025(01): 74-78 . 百度学术
    2. 曾皓,金衍,王海波. 宁东油田致密油储层损害机理与对策. 石油钻探技术. 2024(01): 62-68 . 本站查看
    3. 张煦洋,傅涛,杨绍辉,雷晓贤,邢合生. 库车山前清洁完井工艺技术分析. 石油工业技术监督. 2024(10): 48-53 . 百度学术
    4. 赵平起,王贺强,郭海涛,马翠岩,王子毓. 高渗砂岩油藏钻完井一体化储层保护技术. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(06): 104-112 . 百度学术
    5. 陈志阳. 隐形酸完井液缓蚀剂的制备及性能评价. 石油化工应用. 2022(07): 108-111 . 百度学术
    6. 庞铭,陈华兴,王宇飞,赵顺超,方涛. 渤海L油田注水井欠注原因及对策分析. 海洋石油. 2022(04): 42-47 . 百度学术
    7. 陈飞. 基于改进PSO-SVM的钻井液侵入储层深度预测. 新疆石油天然气. 2020(01): 41-44+3 . 百度学术
    8. 游利军,陈杨,康毅力,闫霄鹏,王艺钧. 低渗气藏入井液损害实验评价的产能指数法. 钻井液与完井液. 2020(05): 620-625 . 百度学术
    9. 张路锋,周福建,张士诚,汪杰,王晋. 塔里木克深致密砂岩气藏基质钻井液伤害评价. 钻井液与完井液. 2019(01): 126-132 . 百度学术
    10. 赵全民,何汉平,何青水,陈向军,王宝峰. 哈萨克斯坦SIPC油田开发主要问题与技术对策. 石油钻探技术. 2019(04): 92-96 . 本站查看
    11. 林四元,张杰,韩成,胡杰,田宗强,郑浩鹏. 东方气田浅部储层大位移水平井钻井关键技术. 石油钻探技术. 2019(05): 17-21 . 本站查看

    其他类型引用(5)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  3123
  • HTML全文浏览量:  71
  • PDF下载量:  4166
  • 被引次数: 16
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-02-02
  • 修回日期:  2015-03-19
  • 刊出日期:  1899-12-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回