A New Method to Calculate the Gas Saturation of the Sand and Shale Formations Based on Logging Rock Mechanics Parameters
-
摘要: 为提高砂泥岩含气储层测井精细解释的符合率,研究了利用测井岩石力学参数计算其含气饱和度的方法(以下简称新方法)。基于岩石体积物理模型和体积弹性模量,推导了岩石体积压缩系数、孔隙流体体积压缩系数及气体压缩系数的计算式,建立了含气饱和度计算模型。以S气田砂泥岩储层测井数据为基础,对比分析了由新方法、Archie公式和物性分析等3种方法计算得到的含气饱和度,并与试气结论进行了对照评价。研究表明,在气层、差气层,用新方法计算的含气饱和度与Archie公式、物性分析得到的结果的平均误差分别为3.5%、4.0%,三者数值上差别不大;在差油层、干层,用新方法计算的含气饱和度与其他2种方法得到的结果差别较大,但其与试气产量相一致,显示出了新方法的优势。研究认为,利用测井岩石力学参数计算砂泥岩储层含气饱和度的新方法,可作为Archie公式计算含气饱和度的有效补充。Abstract: To improve the precision of interpretation of gas reservoir to correlate with the rate of logging, a study using logging rock mechanics parameters to calculate gas saturation of sand and shale rock formations was carried out(hereinafter referred to as the new method).Based on the physical volume in the rock model and the bulk modulus, the formulas of volume compressibility, the fluid compressibility and gas compressibility factors were deduced, and a gas saturation calculation model was established.Based on the logging data in S gas field, the gas saturation results were calculated by the new method, the Archie formula, the Physical Analysis were contrasted, and a controlled evaluation with gas testing conclusion was conducted.The study revealed that the average error of the gas saturation calculated by the new method with the gas saturation from the Archie formula, and the gas saturation from the Physical Analysis in the gas zone was 3.5%, and the poor gas reservoir was 4.0%, the values of the saturation were quite the same.The values of the saturation calculated by new method were quite different with another two methods in dry layer and poor reservoir, but the same with the gas testing result.This proved the advantages of the new method.Studies suggested that this method of calculating the gas saturation could be used as an effective complement to Archie formula.
-
Keywords:
- log data /
- rock mechanics /
- sandstone /
- mudstone /
- compression factor /
- gas saturation
-
-
[1] 刘福利.哈萨克斯坦油田复杂储层饱和度计算方法研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京)能源学院, 2008. Liu Fuli.Kazakhstan oilfield complex reservoirs saturation calculation method[D].Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), School of Energy Resources, 2008. [2] 毕研斌, 石红萍.常规测井资料解释含油饱和度的厚度参数校正[J].断块油气田, 2005, 12(1):38-40. Bi Yanbin, Shi Hongping.Thickness parameter correction on interpreting oil saturation with conventional well logging data[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2005, 12(1):38-40. [3] 赵良孝, 张树东, 胡玲.复杂碳酸盐岩储层含油气饱和度计算方法探索[J].天然气工业, 2005, 25(9):42-44. Zhao Liangxiao, Zhang Shudong, Hu Ling.Calculation methods of the oil and gas saturation in complex carbonate reservoir[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 25(9):42-44. [4] 刘伟, 张德峰, 刘海河, 等.数字岩心技术在致密砂岩储层含油饱和度评价中的应用[J].断块油气田, 2013, 20(5):593-596. Liu Wei, Zhang Defeng, Liu Haihe, et al. Application of digital core technology in oil saturation appraisal of tight sandstone reservoir[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2013, 20(5):593-596. [5] 肖亮, 梁晓东, 林雨静.储层原始含油饱和度评价新方法研究[J].石油地质与工程, 2007, 21(6):53-55. Xiao Liang, Liang Xiaodong, Lin Yujing.Study on a new method for evaluating initial oil saturation of reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2007, 21(6):53-55. [6] Brie A, Pampuri F, Marsala A F, et al.Shear sonic inter-pretation in gas-bearing sands[R].SPE 30595, 1995.
[7] 赵辉, 司马立强, 戴诗华, 等.利用纵横波速度判别火成岩气、水层的理论基础及应用[J].测井技术, 2012, 36(6):602-606. Zhao Hui, Si ma Liqiang, Dai Shihua, et al.The theoretical principle and application of distinguishing igneous gas and water layers using vp/vs[J].Well Logging Technology, 2012, 36(6):602-606. [8] 罗宁, 刘子平, 殷增华, 等.利用纵横波速度比判断储层流体性质[J].测井技术, 2008, 32(4):331-333. Luo Ning, Liu Ziping, Yan Zenghua, et al.Identifying reservoir fluid nature with the ratio of compressional wave velocity to shear wave velocity[J].Well Logging Technology, 2008, 32(4):331-333. [9] Saxena V.Hydrocarbon evaluation through modulus de-composition of sonic velocities in shaly sands[C].SPWLA 37th Annual Logging Symposium, 1996.
[10] 黄国骞.泊松比在储层及流体识别中的应用//中国地球物理学会.中国地球物理:第二十三届年会[G].青岛:中国海洋大学出版社, 2007:244. Huang Guoqian.Poissons Ratio in reservoir fluid identification// Chinese Geophysical Society.The Chinese Geophysics:the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting[G].Qingdao:China Ocean University Press, 2007:244. [11] 张永军, 顾定娜, 马肃滨, 等.阵列声波测井资料在吐哈油田致密砂岩气层识别中的应用[J].测井技术, 2012, 36(2):175-178. Zhang Yongjun, Gu Dingna, Ma Subin, et al.The application of a array acoustic wave data to tight sandstone gas reservoir in Tuha Oilfield[J].Well Logging Technology, 2012, 36(2):175-178. [12] 云美厚, 丁伟, 王新红.利用声波全波列测井确定剩余油饱和度方法研究[J].测井技术, 2004, 28(1):20-23. Yun Meihou, Ding Wei, Wang Xinhong.On methods for predicting residual oil saturation using sonic full waveform logging[J].Well Logging Technology, 2004, 28(1):20-23. [13] 毛志强, 谭廷栋.密度测井和中子测井的相关性及其在识别天然气层中的应用[J].地球物理学报, 1996, 39(1):125-133. Mao Zhiqiang, Tan Tingdong.The correlativity of density log and neturon log and its applation in idenfitying gas formations[J].Acta Geophysica Sinica, 1996, 39(1):125-133. [14] 汤金奎, 王绍春, 高伟, 等.碳氧比能谱测井在冀东油田的应用[J].测井技术, 2013, 37(4):436-440. Shang Jinkui, Wang Shaochun, Gao Wei, et al.Application of C/O spectral logging in Jidong Oilfield[J].Well Logging Technology, 2013, 37(4):436-440. [15] 章成广, 江万哲, 潘和平.声波测井原理与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2009:137-141. Zhang Chengguang, Jiang Wanzhe, Pan Heping.Sonic logging principles and applications[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2009:137-141. [16] 何更生.油层物理[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 1994:127-137. He Gengsheng.Reservoir physics[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1994:127-137. [17] 刘厚彬, 孟英峰, 王先起, 等.利用测井资料预测地层孔隙压力方法研究综述[J].西部探矿工程, 2006, 18(6):91-93. Liu Houbin, Meng Yingfeng, Wang Xianqi, et al.Study on methods of anticipating formation pore pressures with logging data[J].West-China Exploration Engineering, 2006, 18(6):91-93. -
期刊类型引用(2)
1. 向威,李平久,滕召达,梁诗琴,孙福文,王冠群,熊聪. 声测井资料精细评价裂缝型储层技术进展综述. 当代化工研究. 2024(24): 27-29 . 百度学术
2. 尹帅,丁文龙,黄昌杰,肖子亢,周学慧. 非饱和致密砂岩储层含气饱和度测井评价. 天然气地球科学. 2016(01): 156-165 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(5)
计量
- 文章访问数: 3887
- HTML全文浏览量: 111
- PDF下载量: 4820
- 被引次数: 7