Volume 53 Issue 2
Apr.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
HAO Xining, LI Zhong, DANG Bo, et al. Post-casing reservoir monitoring system and influence law based on line sources [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2025, 53(2)：175−180. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2025018
Citation: HAO Xining, LI Zhong, DANG Bo, et al. Post-casing reservoir monitoring system and influence law based on line sources [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2025, 53(2)：175−180. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2025018
shu

Post-Casing Reservoir Monitoring System and Influence Law Based on Line Sources

  • 1.

    CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100028, China

  • 2.

    School of Electronic Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710065, China

More Information
  • Received Date: May 09, 2024
  • Revised Date: February 03, 2025
  • Accepted Date: February 03, 2025
  • Available Online: February 09, 2025
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract

  • In order to achieve real-time monitoring of reservoir parameters such as oil-water interface and online precise control of wellbore production, a post-casing reservoir monitoring system based on line sources was established according to the transient electromagnetic theory. Through numerical simulation, the basic characteristics of the post-casing reservoir monitoring system and the influence law of different factors on the post-casing detection performance of the reservoirs based on line sources were analyzed. The simulation results show that using the casing as a line source can apply a greater current, and the strength of the secondary field signal is positively correlated with the line source current. The suitable emission length of the line source is around 300 m. A larger wall thickness of the casing indicates a higher amplitude of the electric field response. The results show that the post-casing reservoir monitoring system based on line sources has good oil-water interface recognition ability within a range of 15 m, which can provide effective technical means for online monitoring and stable oil and water control of oil and gas wells.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (23)
  • [1]
    贾德利,刘合,张吉群,等. 大数据驱动下的老油田精细注水优化方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2020,47(3):629–636. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.03.19

    JIA Deli, LIU He, ZHANG Jiqun, et al. Data-driven optimization for fine water injection in a mature oil field[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(3): 629–636. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.03.19
    [2]
    王静,杨彬. 精细注水在渤海某油田J区的应用研究[J]. 承德石油高等专科学校学报,2023,25(2):11–16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9446.2023.02.004

    WANG Jing, YANG Bin. Application of fine water injection in block J of an oilfield in bohai sea[J]. Journal of Chengde Petroleum College, 2023, 25(2): 11–16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9446.2023.02.004
    [3]
    孙福街,徐文江,姜维东,等. 中国海油低渗及非常规油气藏储层改造技术进展及展望[J]. 中国海上油气,2024,36(1):109–116.

    SUN Fujie, XU Wenjiang, JIANG Weidong, et al. Progress and prospects of CNOOC’s low permeability and unconventional oil and gas reservoir stimulation technologies[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2024, 36(1): 109–116.
    [4]
    吴飞鹏,李娜,孙德旭,等. 脉动水驱孔隙压力传输规律数学模型[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2022,46(4):94–101. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2022.04.011

    WU Feipeng, LI Na, SUN Dexu, et al. Mathematical model of pore pressure transmission law in pulsating water flooding[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2022, 46(4): 94–101. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2022.04.011
    [5]
    刘会锋,贾婉婷,崔龙连,等. 考虑储层非均质性的限流筛管完井设计及应用[J]. 石油机械,2023,51(4):97–104.

    LIU Huifeng, JIA Wanting, CUI Longlian, et al. Design and application of limited entry liner completion considering reservoir heterogeneity[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2023, 51(4): 97–104.
    [6]
    邵晓岩,杨学武,孟令为,等. W油田C6低渗透油藏水驱后储层特征变化规律[J]. 特种油气藏,2022,29(5):107–112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2022.05.015

    SHAO Xiaoyan, YANG Xuewu, MENG Lingwei, et al. Change law of reservoir characteristics after water flooding of C6 low permeability reservoir in W Oilfield[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2022, 29(5): 107–112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2022.05.015
    [7]
    石立华,师调调,廖志昊,等. 低渗致密砂岩油藏水驱储层变化规律[J]. 特种油气藏,2024,31(3):106–115. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.03.014

    SHI Lihua, SHI Diaodiao, LIAO Zhihao, et al. The variation law of water flooding reservoir in low permeability tight sandstone reservoirs[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2024, 31(3): 106–115. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.03.014
    [8]
    骆晨,刘慧卿,柏宗宪,等. 低渗透油藏空气驱氧化特征及驱油效果评价[J]. 特种油气藏,2024,31(4):109–117. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.04.014

    LUO Chen, LIU Huiqing, BAI Zongxian, et al. Oxidation characteristics and oil displacement effect evaluation of air flooding in low permeability reservoirs[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2024, 31(4): 109–117. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.04.014
    [9]
    张岩,冯海顺,翟勇,等. 低渗透稠油油藏CO2压驱提高采收率机理及规律研究[J]. 石油钻探技术,2024,52(6):97–106. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2024070

    ZHANG Yan, FENG Haishun, ZHAI Yong, et al. Mechanism and law of CO2 pressure flooding in enhancing oil recovery in low-permeability heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2024, 52(6): 97–106. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2024070
    [10]
    薄其众,戴涛,杨勇,等. 胜利油田樊142块特低渗透油藏CO2驱油储层压力动态变化研究[J]. 石油钻探技术,2016,44(6):93–98.

    BO Qizhong, DAI Tao, YANG Yong, et al. Research on the changes in formation pressure performance of CO2 flooding in the ultra-low permeability oil reservoir: Block Fan 142 of the Shengli Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(6): 93–98.
    [11]
    毕昕瑶. 双示踪组合测井技术在G45-16C井区的应用分析[J]. 石油管材与仪器,2018,4(3):62–65.

    BI Xinyao. Application effect analysis of double tracer combination logging technology in G45-16C Well Area[J]. Petroleum Instruments, 2018, 4(3): 62–65.
    [12]
    PARDO D, MATUSZYK P J, PUZYREV V, et al. Chapter 3-Modeling of resistivity geophysical measurements[M]//PARDO D, MATUSZYK P J, PUZYREV V, et al. Modeling of resistivity and acoustic borehole logging measurements using finite element methods. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2021: 77-113.
    [13]
    DAVLATSHOEV S K. Evaluation of the quality of strengthening cementation of an enclosing sandstone massif under tensile stresses[J]. Power Technology and Engineering, 2022, 56(1): 46–51. doi: 10.1007/s10749-023-01469-0
    [14]
    FAN Jilin, ZHANG Feng, TIAN Lili, et al. A method of monitoring gas saturation in carbon dioxide injection heavy oil reservoirs by pulsed neutron logging technology[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(6): 1420–1429. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(21)60298-7
    [15]
    孙歧峰,倪虹升,岳喜洲,等. 基于深度残差网络的随钻方位电磁波电阻率测井反演方法[J]. 石油钻探技术,2024,52(5):97–104.

    SUN Qifeng, NI Hongsheng, YUE Xizhou, et al. Inversion of azimuthal electromagnetic wave resistivity LWD based on deep residual network[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2024, 52(5): 97–104.
    [16]
    秦文娟,康正明,张意,等. 模块化随钻电磁波测井仪器结构对测量信号的影响[J]. 石油钻探技术,2024,52(3):137–145. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2023101

    QIN Wenjuan, KANG Zhengming, ZHANG Yi, et al. Influence of structure of modular electromagnetic logging while drilling instrument on measurement signals[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2024, 52(3): 137–145. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2023101
    [17]
    许孝凯,赵伟娜,张晋言,等. 三轴各向异性层状介质磁偶极子源电磁场递推算法及应用[J]. 石油钻探技术,2024,52(1):130–139. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2023117

    XU Xiaokai, ZHAO Weina, ZHANG Jinyan, et al. Recursive algorithm for electromagnetic fields from magnetic dipole in layered triaxial anisotropic medium and its application[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2024, 52(1): 130–139. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2023117
    [18]
    刘鹏程,沈建国,沈永进. 瞬变电磁测井的过套管地层电导率探测[J]. 石油物探,2020,59(4):655–664. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2020.04.016

    LIU Pengcheng, SHEN Jianguo, SHEN Yongjin. Measuring formation conductivity by transient electromagnetic logging through casing[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2020, 59(4): 655–664. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2020.04.016
    [19]
    刘思慧,臧德福,张守伟,等. 瞬变电磁法过套管电阻率测井技术综述[J]. 地球物理学进展,2018,33(3):1088–1094. doi: 10.6038/pg2018BB0197

    LIU Sihui, ZANG Defu, ZHANG Shouwei, et al. Review of the technology of transient electromagnetic resistivity logging through casing[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2018, 33(3): 1088–1094. doi: 10.6038/pg2018BB0197
    [20]
    党瑞荣,刘丹,贾惠芹,等. 基于线源的三维地电响应模型分析与仿真[J]. 电气应用,2014,33(5):54–58.

    DANG Ruirong, LIU Dan, JIA Huiqin, et al. Analysis and simulation of three-dimensional geoelectric response model based on line source[J]. Electrotechnical Application, 2014, 33(5): 54–58.
    [21]
    康正明,秦浩杰,张意,等. 基于LSTM神经网络的随钻方位电磁波测井数据反演[J]. 石油钻探技术,2023,51(2):116–124. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2023047

    KANG Zhengming, QIN Haojie, ZHANG Yi, et al. Data inversion of azimuthal electromagnetic wave logging while drilling based on LSTM neural network[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2023, 51(2): 116–124. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2023047
    [22]
    郭晨,陈晓亮. 各向异性地层有限长线源电磁场响应研究[J]. 物探化探计算技术,2019,41(5):631–638. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1749.2019.05.11

    GUO Chen, CHEN Xiaoliang. Electromagnetic field response of finite length line source in anisotropic formation[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2019, 41(5): 631–638. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1749.2019.05.11
    [23]
    李亭亭,王佳,朱凯光. 井地电磁法勘探深度研究[J]. 地球物理学进展,2013,28(1):373–379. doi: 10.6038/pg20130141

    LI Tingting, WANG Jia, ZHU Kaiguang. Research on the exploration depth of the borehole-surface electromagnetic field[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2013, 28(1): 373–379. doi: 10.6038/pg20130141
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]YUAN Jianqiang. New Progress and Development Proposals of Sinopec’s Drilling Technologies for Ultra-Long Horizontal Shale Gas Wells[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2023, 51(4): 81-87. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2023030
    [2]ZENG Yijin. Novel Advancements and Development Suggestions of Cementing Technologies for Deep and Ultra-Deep Wells of Sinopec[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2023, 51(4): 66-73. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2023035
    [3]LIU Honglei, ZHOU Linbo, CHEN Zuo, BO Qiwei, MA Yusheng. The Up-to-Date Electric Shale Gas Fracturing Technologies of Sinopec and Suggestions for Further Improvements[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2023, 51(1): 62-68. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2022100
    [4]ZHANG Jinhong. Present Status and Development Prospects of Sinopec Shale Oil Engineering Technologies[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(4): 8-13. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2021072
    [5]LU Baoping, HOU Xutian, KE Ke. Achievements and Developing Suggestions of Sinopec’s Drilling Technologies in Arctic Sea[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(3): 1-10. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2021046
    [6]DING Shidong, ZHAO Xiangyang. New Progress and Development Suggestions for Drilling and Completion Technologies in Sinopec Key Exploration Areas[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(4): 11-20. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2020069
    [7]ZHANG Jinhong. Current Status and Outlook for the Development of Sinopec’s Petroleum Engineering Technologies[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(3): 9-17. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2019061
    [8]MA Kaihua, HOU Lizhong, ZHANG Hongbao. Drilling Completion Technologies of Sinopec Overseas Oilfields: Status Quo of Technology Development Suggestions[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2018, 46(5): 1-7. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2018128
    [9]Lu Baoping. Sinopec Engineering Technical Advance and Its Developing Tendency in Shale Gas[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2013, 41(5): 1-8. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2013.05.001
    [10]Yan Guangqing, Zhang Jincheng. Status and Proposal of the Sinopec Ultra-Deep Drilling Technology[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2013, 41(2): 1-6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2013.02.001

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(18)

    1. 焦卫国，王健，杨凤春，李志刚. 钻井提速技术在GT1井的综合应用. 石油工程建设. 2024(S1): 39-42 .
    2. 赵洪波，朱芝同，梁涛，赵志涛，朱迪斯，单文军，刘文武，何远信. 页岩气基础地质调查钻井技术研究进展及展望. 中国地质. 2023(02): 376-394 .
    3. 徐建飞，邹德永，高栋梁，王震. 切削-犁削-磨削混合金刚石钻头的研制及应用. 科技通报. 2022(10): 16-19 .
    4. 袁国栋，王鸿远，陈宗琦，母亚军，席宝滨. 塔里木盆地满深1井超深井钻井关键技术. 石油钻探技术. 2020(04): 21-27 . 本站查看
    5. 王滨，邹德永，李军，杨宏伟，黄涛. 深部及复杂地层中PDC钻头综合改进方法. 石油钻采工艺. 2018(01): 44-51 .
    6. 刘笑傲，邹德永，陈修平. 强研磨性硬地层金钢石复合汽钻头孕镶块混合钻头优化设计试验. 科学技术与工程. 2017(29): 220-226 .
    7. 郭宝林，孙庆春. 鸭西背斜钻井提速技术试验及效果分析. 探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程). 2017(02): 53-56 .
    8. 陈彦霖，邹德永，马宇奔，王滨. PDC-孕镶块混合齿钻头同轨布齿出露高差试验优选. 钻采工艺. 2017(02): 14-16+76+5-6 .
    9. 董佳辉，殷忠玲. 基于微钻试验台检测系统的研究与设计. 自动化与仪器仪表. 2017(11): 75-77 .
    10. 袁军，邹德永，刘笑傲. 切向导入式旋流喷嘴辅助PDC钻头破岩实验. 断块油气田. 2016(04): 528-532 .
    11. 袁军，邹德永，钟洪娇，刘笑傲. 适合于研磨性硬地层的新型孕镶金刚石钻头优化设计试验研究. 科学技术与工程. 2016(04): 16-21 .
    12. 吴仲华，温林荣，丁世清，何育光，赵哲龙，付晓颖. 孕镶金刚石钻头配合螺杆钻具在乌参1井应用. 石油矿场机械. 2016(05): 83-87 .
    13. 谭凯文，肖华平，刘书海. 4种钻采装备的减磨抗磨损技术研究进展. 石油矿场机械. 2016(05): 102-110 .
    14. 杨顺辉. 新型多重复合切削钻头的研制. 石油机械. 2016(10): 21-24 .
    15. 郭宝林，孙庆春，于建克，安川. 鸭K区块钻井提速与钻头使用分析. 天然气与石油. 2016(06): 60-65+145 .
    16. 邹德永，郭玉龙，赵建，陈修平，王家骏，于金平. 锥形PDC单齿破岩试验研究. 石油钻探技术. 2015(01): 122-125 . 本站查看
    17. 关舒伟. 新型孕镶金刚石钻头研制及试验. 石油钻探技术. 2015(04): 129-132 . 本站查看
    18. 陈修平，邹德永，李东杰，娄尔标. PDC钻头防泥包性能数值模拟研究. 石油钻探技术. 2015(06): 108-113 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (60) PDF downloads (23) Cited by(19)
    Related

    Supervisor：SINOPEC GROUP

    Sponsor：Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering

    Serial Number：CN 11-1763/TE, ISSN 1001-0890

    Chief Editor： WANG Minsheng

    Vice Chief Editor：LIU Xiushan, ZHOU Shiming, CHEN Zuo, YE Haichao,
    CHEN Huinian

    Address：Sinopec Science and Technology Research Center, No.197 Baisha Road, Changping District, Beijing, China

    Tel：010-56606846, 56606847, 56606848, 56606849, 56606850

    E-mail：syzt@vip.163.com

    Copyright © 2009《Petroleum Drilling Techniques 》 All Rights Reserved.

    京公网安备 11010502036328号 京ICP备17033152号

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return