Calculation of Optimal Distance Between Electrode and Probe in Relief Well Magnetic Ranging

LI Fuqiang; SONG Zhaohui; YI Ming; LIU Hongtao; ZHANG Sen; DIAO Binbin

doi:10.11911/syztjs.2024008

Volume 52 Issue 3

Jun. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Petroleum Drilling Techniques > 2024 > 52(3): 34-39. > DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2024008

LI Fuqiang, SONG Zhaohui, YI Ming, et al. Calculation of optimal distance between electrode and probe in relief well magnetic ranging [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2024, 52(3)：34-39. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2024008

Citation:

PDF (2563 KB)

Calculation of Optimal Distance Between Electrode and Probe in Relief Well Magnetic Ranging

1.
Engineering Technology Research Institute, CNPC Xibu Drilling Engineering Co.,Ltd., Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830000, China
2.
MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China

More Information

Received Date: October 23, 2023
Revised Date: February 26, 2024
Available Online: January 16, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Ranging accuracy is a key factor affecting the successful connection between relief wells and accident wells. In order to improve the measurement accuracy of the active magnetic ranging system based on injected current, the electric field distribution in each medium was analyzed, and the current density distribution model of the accident well casing was established. By analyzing the current density distribution law of accident well casing, the calculation model of the optimal distance between the electrode and the probe based on the principle of the maximum magnetic induction intensity at the measuring point was established and the effectiveness of the model was verified by comparison test results. Calculations with examples show that the optimal distance between the electrode and the probe is related to not only the distance between the electrode and the accident well but also the relative well inclination angle. In addition, it has nothing to do with the injected current intensity. The distance between the peak point of the casing current density of the accident well and the coordinate point of the accident well is approximately equal to that between the electrode and the probe in the accident well. The optimal distance between the electrode and the probe is approximately equal to the product of the distance between the electrode and the accident well and the cosecant of the relative inclination angle. According to the calculation results of the optimal distance, a reasonable design of the distance between the electrode and the probe can contribute to the improvement measurement accuracy of the active magnetic ranging system based on injected current.
- relief well,
- accident well,
- magnetic ranging,
- ranging accuracy,
- distance between electrode and probe

FullText(HTML)

References (22)

References

[1]	FLORES V, DAILEY P, TODD D, et al. Relief well planning[R]. SPE 168029, 2014.
[2]	车阳,乔磊,王建国,等. X 井精准治理技术研究与应用[J]. 断块油气田,2023,30(2):347–352. CHE Yang, QIAO Lei, WANG Jianguo, et al. Research and application of precise treatment technology for well X[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2023, 30(2): 347–352.
[3]	刁斌斌,高德利,唐海雄,等. 救援井与事故井邻井距离探测技术[C]//第十六届全国探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程)技术学术交流年会论文集. 北京:地质出版社,2011:201-205. DIAO Binbin, GAO Deli, TANG Haixiong, et al. The distance detection technology between rescue wells and accident wells [C]//Proceedings of the 16th National Academic Exchange Conference on Exploration Engineering (Rock and Soil Drilling Engineering) Technology. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2011: 201-205.
[4]	WOLFF C J M, DE WARDT J P. Borehole position uncertainty-analysis of measuring methods and derivation of systematic error model[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1981, 33(12): 2338–2350. doi: 10.2118/9223-PA
[5]	WILLIAMSON H S. Accuracy prediction for directional measurement while drilling[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2000, 15(4): 221–233.
[6]	TORKILDSEN T, HÅVARDSTEIN S T, WESTON J, et al. Prediction of wellbore position accuracy when surveyed with gyroscopic tools[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2008, 23(1): 5–12.
[7]	DIAO Binbin, GAO Deli. Study on a ranging system based on dual solenoid assemblies, for determining the relative position of two adjacent wells[J]. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2013, 90(1): 77–90.
[8]	KUCKES A F, HAY R T, MCMAHON J, et al. New electromagnetic surveying/ranging method for drilling parallel horizontal twin wells[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 1996, 11(2): 85–90.
[9]	高德利,刁斌斌. 复杂结构井磁导向钻井技术进展[J]. 石油钻探技术,2016,44(5):1–9. GAO Deli, DIAO Binbin. Development of the magnetic guidance drilling technique in complex well engineering[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(5): 1–9.
[10]	李翠,高德利,刘庆龙,等. 邻井随钻电磁测距防碰计算方法研究[J]. 石油钻探技术,2016,44(5):52–59. LI Cui, GAO Deli, LIU Qinglong, et al. A method of calculating of avoiding collisions with adjacent wells using electromagnetic ranging surveying while drilling tools[J]. Petroleum Drilling Technique, 2016, 44(5): 52–59.
[11]	WEST C L, KUCKES A F, RITCH H J. Successful ELREC logging for casing proximity in an offshore Louisiana blowout[R]. SPE 11996, 1983.
[12]	KUCKES A F, LAUTZENHISER T, NEKUT A G, et al. An electromagnetic survey method for directionally drilling a relief well into a blown out oil or gas well[J]. SPE Journal, 1984, 24(3): 269–274.
[13]	李翠,高丽萍,李佳,等. 邻井随钻电磁测距防碰工具模拟试验研究[J]. 石油钻探技术,2017,45(6):110–115. LI Cui, GAO Liping, LI Jia, et al. Experiment research on an electromagnetic anti-collision detection tool while drilling adjacent wells[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2017, 45(6): 110–115.
[14]	DIAO Binbin, GAO Deli, LI Genkui. Development of static magnetic detection anti-collision system while drilling[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications. Amsterdam: Atlantis Press, 2016: 543-551.
[15]	WU Zhiyong, GAO Deli, DIAO Binbin. An investigation of electromagnetic anti-collision real-time measurement for drilling cluster wells[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 23: 346–355. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.02.016
[16]	刁斌斌,高德利. 邻井定向分离系数计算方法[J]. 石油钻探技术,2012,40(1):22–27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2012.01.005 DIAO Binbin, GAO Deli. Calculation method of adjacent well oriented separation factors[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2012, 40(1): 22–27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2012.01.005
[17]	DOU Xinyu, LIANG Huaqing, LIU Yang. Anticollision method of active magnetic guidance ranging for cluster wells[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 2018: 7583425.
[18]	INGRAM S R, LAHMAN M, PERSAC S. Methods improve stimulation efficiency of perforation clusters in completions[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2014, 66(4): 32–36. doi: 10.2118/0414-0032-JPT
[19]	李翠,高德利. 救援井与事故井连通探测方法初步研究[J]. 石油钻探技术,2013,41(3):56–61. LI Cui, GAO Deli. Preliminary research on detection method for connecting relief well to blowout well[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2013, 41(3): 56–61.
[20]	LI Cui, GAO Deli, WU Zhiyong, et al. A method for the detection of the distance & orientation of the relief well to a blowout well in offshore drilling[J]. Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 2012, 89(1): 39–56.
[21]	ZHANG Sen, DIAO Binbin, GAO Deli. A new method of anti-collision while drilling based on radial gradient measurement[R]. ARMA-2019-0114, 2019.
[22]	ZHANG Sen, DIAO Binbin, GAO Deli. Numerical simulation and sensitivity analysis of accurate ranging of adjacent wells while drilling[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 195: 107536. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107536

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(23)

1.	程宇雄，彭成勇，武广瑷，史伟奇，陈明贵，姜浒，吴百烈. 海上160℃高温砂岩气藏螯合酸解堵体系的研制与现场应用. 油田化学. 2025(01): 59-67+89 .
2.	张雪萍，刘亮，高彪，张仙伟. 低渗透油田高压注水井在线酸化增注技术. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(06): 88-94 .
3.	周恩甲，袁海娜，王雪芝，雷海，罗志飞. 一种新型降压增注酸液性能评价. 石油化工安全环保技术. 2024(06): 32-36+6-7 .
4.	平恩顺，张明晰，王瑞泓，王永亮，赵磊，李路遥，张京宝. 跨采油树不动管柱酸压增注技术研究. 钻采工艺. 2023(02): 122-125 .
5.	董小刚，黄哲，聂安琪，杨嫱. 纳米乳液降压增注技术研究与试验. 精细石油化工. 2022(01): 53-57 .
6.	梁玉凯，于晓聪，宋吉峰，阚长宾，韩宇，徐启立. 高黏土疏松低渗透砂岩储层注水过程中梯度防堵体系的防堵降压效果. 油田化学. 2022(01): 69-75 .
7.	惠鑫，黄小峰，刘虎，马志峰. 低渗油田高压注水井在线酸化技术研究与试验. 化学与粘合. 2022(03): 224-228+237 .
8.	张顶学，孙意，高伟，许译文，古仁超. 低渗透油藏注水井水力多级脉冲酸化工艺及应用——以姬塬油田为例. 长江大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(05): 51-56 .
9.	李康，汤佳佳，郝杰，武金卫. 注水井多氢酸深部酸化技术研究与化学实验. 粘接. 2022(08): 133-137 .
10.	孙林，李旭光，黄利平，夏光，杨淼. 渤海油田注水井延效酸化技术研究与应用. 石油钻探技术. 2021(02): 90-95 . 本站查看
11.	王巧智，苏延辉，江安，郑春峰，高波，张云飞. 可控冲击波增渗解堵技术实验研究. 天然气与石油. 2021(02): 68-74 .
12.	代磊阳，杨树坤，张晓冉，郭宏峰，黎慧，赵广渊. 连续油管负压解堵技术在渤海油田的应用探索. 当代化工. 2021(07): 1627-1631 .
13.	令永刚，杨乾隆，陶思羽，方燕. 华庆里183油藏高效开发工艺技术研究与应用. 石油化工应用. 2021(11): 62-65+74 .
14.	李新勇，李春月，赵兵，房好青，黄燕飞，胡文庭. 顺北油气田主干断裂带深穿透酸化技术. 石油钻探技术. 2020(02): 82-87 . 本站查看
15.	周鹏，杜孝友，曹砚锋，于继飞，江海畏，薛启龙. 电爆冲击波增渗解堵技术试验研究. 石油钻探技术. 2020(02): 98-103 . 本站查看
16.	张智，杨昆，刘和兴，李磊，梁继文. 注水井井筒完整性设计方法. 石油钻采工艺. 2020(01): 76-85 .
17.	赵立强，陈祥，山金城，刘平礼，刘长龙. 注水井螯合酸复合解堵体系研究与应用. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(03): 123-131 .
18.	王勇，王尔珍，隋蕾，张顶学，高伟. 镇北长8油藏缓速酸冲压酸化增注技术研究及应用. 石油与天然气化工. 2020(05): 82-86 .
19.	何延龙，董巧玲，景成，谷潇雨，董浩，任龙，杨建轩. 沥青质堵塞储层水力脉冲波协同解吸机制. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(04): 106-118 .
20.	李进，王昆剑，韩耀图，张启龙，贾立新. 渤海油田注水井酸化效果预测评价方法. 钻井液与完井液. 2019(04): 506-511 .
21.	李勇. 埕岛油田长效细分注水关键技术及应用. 石油机械. 2019(10): 94-100 .
22.	李帮军. 吴起油田注水井酸化增注工艺研究. 石化技术. 2019(10): 126+128 .
23.	马惠，李立峰，冯绪波. 江苏油田不动管柱复合解堵技术的研究及应用. 复杂油气藏. 2019(04): 79-83 .

Other cited types(4)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (195) PDF downloads (71) Cited by(27)

Calculation of Optimal Distance Between Electrode and Probe in Relief Well Magnetic Ranging

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(23)

Other cited types(4)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

Calculation of Optimal Distance Between Electrode and Probe in Relief Well Magnetic Ranging

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(23)

Other cited types(4)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content