Citation: | LI Hao, ZENG Dezhi, GAO Dingxiang, LIU Fei, TIAN Gang, SHI Taihe. A Study of the Notch Fatigue Behavior of S135 Drill Pipe Joint[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(4): 64-69. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2019013 |
Drill pipe joint fatigue is the main form of drill pipe failure. In order to improve the safety fatigue life of drill pipe, the notch fatigue behavior of S135 drill pipe joint has been studied. The fatigue specimens were designed according to the force characteristics of drill pipe joint, and the influence of stress concentration on the fatigue performance of S135 drill pipe was studied by PQ-6 rotary bending fatigue tester and scanning electron microscope. The results showed that the fatigue of S135 drill pipe exhibited certain sensitivity to the V-notch. The smaller the notch root radius, the larger the stress concentration factor, and the more serious impact on the fatigue performance. The stress concentration factor and the fatigue strength are in accordance with the power function relationship. The process is as follows: the fatigue crack starts from the root of notch, and many sources of cracks existed (in annular arrangement). When the stress is the same, the tearing phenomenon at the root of notch weakens with the increase of stress concentration factor, the fracture becomes smooth and flat, and the fatigue fringes become fine and dense. The research results showed that the optimal design of the drill pipe thread joint could reduce or alleviate the stress concentration of the root, reduce the fatigue sensitivity of S135 drill pipe to the notch, and improve the safety by better mapping the fatigue life of S135 drill pipe.
[1] |
HUANG Bensheng, YANG Jiang, ZHANG Hui, et al. Influence of H2S corrosion on rotating bending fatigue properties of S135 drill pipe steel[J]. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2018, 71(1): 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s12666-017-1135-5
|
[2] |
ZENG Dezhi, TIAN Gang, HU Junying, et al. Effect of immersion time on the mechanical properties of S135 drill pipe immersed in H2S solution[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2014, 23(11): 4072–4081. doi: 10.1007/s11665-014-1198-y
|
[3] |
OJANOMARE C, CORNETTI P, ROMAGNOLI R A. Fatigue crack growth analysis of drill pipes during rotary drilling operations by the multiple reference state weight function approach[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2017, 74: 11–34. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.12.013
|
[4] |
LIU Yonggang, LIAN Zhanghua, LIN Tiejun, et al. A study on axial cracking failure of drill pipe body[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2016, 59: 434–443. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.004
|
[5] |
ZAMANI S M, HASSANZADEH-TABRIZI S A, SHARIFI H. Failure analysis of drill pipe: a review[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2016, 59: 605–623. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.10.012
|
[6] |
LIN Yuanhua, ZHU Dajiang, ZENG Dezhi, et al. Numerical and experimental distribution of stress fields for double shoulder tool joint[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2011, 18(6): 1584–1594. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.06.003
|
[7] |
LIN Yuanhua, LI Qiang, SUN Yongxing, et al. A repeated impact method and instrument to evaluate the impact fatigue property of drill pipe[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering & Performance, 2013, 22(4): 1064–1071.
|
[8] |
LIN Yuanhua, QI Xing, ZHU Dajiang, et al. Failure analysis and appropriate design of drill pipe upset transition area[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2013, 31(31): 255–267.
|
[9] |
林元华,潘杰,刘婉颖,等. 硫化氢环境下G–105 和S–135 钻杆的低载多冲疲劳性能测试[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2016, 38(1): 59–63.
LIN Yuanhua,PAN Jie,LIU Wanying,et al. Low-load repeated impact testing of G-105 and S-135 drill pipes in H2S environ-ment[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2016, 38(1): 59–63.
|
[10] |
HAN Yan, ZHAO Xuehu, BAI Zhenquan, et al. Failure analysis on fracture of a S135 drill pipe[J]. Procedia Materials Science, 2014, 3: 447–453. doi: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.075
|
[11] |
LU Shuanlu, FENG Yaorong, LUO Faqian, et al. Failure analysis of IEU drill pipe wash out[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2005, 27(10/11/12): 1360–1365.
|
[12] |
SHATSHATS'KYI I P, LYSKANYCH O M, KORNUTA V A. Combined deformation conditions for fatigue damage indicator and well-drilling tool joint[J]. Strength of Materials, 2016, 48(3): 469–472. doi: 10.1007/s11223-016-9786-8
|
[13] |
N'DIAYE A, HARIRI S, PLUVINAGE G, et al. Stress concentration factor analysis for notched welded tubular T-joints[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2007, 29(8): 1554–1570. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.030
|
[14] |
ZUCUNI C P, GUILARDI L F, FRAGA S, et al. CAD/CAM machining vs pre-sintering in-lab fabrication techniques of Y-TZP ceramic specimens: effects on their mechanical fatigue behavior[J]. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2017, 71: 201–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.013
|
[15] |
FRAGA S, PEREIRA G K R, FREITAS M A, et al. Loading frequencies up to 20 Hz as an alternative to accelerate fatigue strength tests in a Y-TZP ceramic[J]. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2016, 61: 79–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.008
|
[16] |
WAN Aoshuang, XIONG Junjiang, LYU Zhiyang, et al. High-cycle fatigue behavior of Co-based superalloy 9CrCo at elevated temperatures[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2016, 29(5): 1405–1413. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2016.01.009
|
[17] |
EWEST D, ALMROTH P, SJODIN B, et al. A modified compliance method for fatigue crack propagation applied on a single edge notch specimen[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2016, 92(1): 61–70.
|
[18] |
束德林. 工程材料力学性能[M]. 3版. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2017.
SHU Delin. Mechanical properties of engineering materials[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: Mechanical Industry Press, 2017.
|
1. |
王遵察,程万,艾昆,胡清海,石育钊. 井工厂井网部署与压裂模式发展现状与展望. 钻探工程. 2024(03): 9-19 .
![]() | |
2. |
曹刚,白璐,马洪亮,张新臣. 大井丛多层系立体开发钻井一体化设计技术在HQ802建产区的研究与应用. 石化技术. 2023(09): 32-33+3 .
![]() | |
3. |
史配铭,薛让平,王学枫,王万庆,石崇东,杨勇. 苏里格气田致密气藏水平井优快钻井技术. 石油钻探技术. 2020(05): 27-33 .
![]() | |
4. |
沈兆超,霍如军,郁燕飞,董易凡,倪小伟,雷宇. 苏里格南区块小井眼井二开一趟钻钻井技术. 石油钻探技术. 2020(06): 15-20 .
![]() | |
5. |
刘乃震,何凯,叶成林. 地质工程一体化在苏里格致密气藏开发中的应用. 中国石油勘探. 2017(01): 53-60 .
![]() |