SUN Zhifeng, QIU Ao, JIN Ya, et al. Optimal design and experimental study of the receiver sonde in multipole acoustic LWD tools [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2022, 50(4):114-120. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2022089
Citation: SUN Zhifeng, QIU Ao, JIN Ya, et al. Optimal design and experimental study of the receiver sonde in multipole acoustic LWD tools [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2022, 50(4):114-120. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2022089

Optimal Design and Experimental Study of the Receiver Sonde in Multipole Acoustic LWD Tools

More Information
  • Received Date: February 16, 2022
  • Revised Date: June 14, 2022
  • Available Online: June 22, 2022
  • The receiver sonde of multipole acoustic logging while drilling (LWD) tools directly affects the quality of collected signals and the stability of the tool’s mechanical structure. Therefore, the receiver sonde of multipole acoustic LWD tools was optimized in this study by combining finite element method and experimental measurements. The analysis of the receiver sonde simulation showed that the performance of the receiver sonde was mainly affected by the thickness and area of piezoelectric ceramic slices as well as the thickness and surface flatness of packaging shells. In addition, receiving sensitivity would be enhanced as the thickness of piezoelectric ceramic slices increased, and the area of piezoelectric ceramic slices had no obvious effect on receiving sensitivity when the frequency was below 15 kHz. Furthermore, the variation range of the receiving sensitivity would be smaller as the thickness of packaging shells decreased and the surface flatness increased. On this basis, long square tubes with aluminum shells were processed using 3D printing technology, with a thickness of 0.5 mm and 2.0 mm, respectively. Then, the fabricated receiver sonde was tested in terms of sensitivity, and the test results were in good agreement with the calculated results. As a result, it was demonstrated that thin-wall shells were more beneficial to the signal receiving of measurement. The optimal design of receiver sonde in multipole acoustic LWD tools will provide new possibilities for designing and developing acoustic LWD tools in China.

  • [1]
    TANG X M, CHENG A. Quantitative borehole acoustic me-thods[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004.
    [2]
    庄春喜,李杨虎,孔凡童,等. 随钻斯通利波测井反演地层渗透率的理论、方法及应用[J]. 地球物理学报,2019,62(11):4482–4492. doi: 10.6038/cjg2019N0122

    ZHUANG Chunxi, LI Yanghu, KONG Fantong, et al. Formation permeability estimation using Stoneley waves from logging while drilling: theory, method, and application[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2019, 62(11): 4482–4492. doi: 10.6038/cjg2019N0122
    [3]
    林剑松,李盛清,刘忠华,等. 随钻划眼采集模式的过套管声波测井数值模拟与实验研究[J]. 地球物理学进展,2021,36(6):2496–2502. doi: 10.6038/pg2021EE0477

    LIN Jiansong, LI Shengqing, LIU Zhonghua, et al. Numerical simulation and experimental research of through casing sonic logging with redressing LWD acquisition mode[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2021, 36(6): 2496–2502. doi: 10.6038/pg2021EE0477
    [4]
    DEGRANGE J M, HAWTHORN A, NAKAJIMA H, et al. Sonic while drilling: multipole acoustic tools for multiple answers[R]. SPE 128162, 2010.
    [5]
    朱祖扬,吴海燕,李永杰,等. 钻铤结构对随钻声波测井响应的影响[J]. 石油钻探技术,2016,44(6):117–122. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.201606020

    ZHU Zuyang, WU Haiyan, LI Yongjie, et al. The effect of collar structure on acoustic logging response while drilling[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(6): 117–122. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.201606020
    [6]
    刘西恩,孙志峰,仇傲,等. 随钻四极子声波测井仪的设计及试验[J]. 石油钻探技术,2022,50(3):125–131.

    LIU Xien, SUN Zhifeng, QIU Ao, et al. Design and experiment for a quadrupole acoustic LWD tool[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2022, 50(3): 125–131.
    [7]
    刘西恩,孙志峰,仇傲,等. EXDT正交偶极阵列声波测井仪在地层各向异性评价中的应用[J]. 测井技术,2010,34(6):564–568. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2010.06.011

    LIU Xien, SUN Zhifeng, QIU Ao, et al. Application of the EXDT cross-dipole array acoustic logging tool to anisotropic formations evaluation[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2010, 34(6): 564–568. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2010.06.011
    [8]
    李世平,唐炼,丛健生. 叠片型多极子阵列声波测井仪接收换能器灵敏度分析[J]. 测井技术,2012,36(6):620–623. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2012.06.015

    LI Shiping, TANG Lian, CONG Jiansheng. Finite element analysis of receiving transducers for multipole acoustic array logging tool[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2012, 36(6): 620–623. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2012.06.015
    [9]
    JIANG Runkun, MEI Lei, LIU Xien, et al. Understanding logging-while-drilling transducers with COMSOL Multiphysics® software[C]//COMSOL Conference 2014, Boston: Monix Energy Solutions, Inc, 2014.
    [10]
    TANG X M, WANG T, PATTERSON D. Multipole acoustic logging-while-drilling[R]. SEG-2002-0364, 2002.
    [11]
    吴金平,乔文孝,车小花. 声波测井高灵敏度宽带接收器研究[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2014,38(6):54–60.

    WU Jinping, QIAO Wenxiao, CHE Xiaohua. Research on high-sensitivity and wide-band receiver used in acoustic well logging[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2014, 38(6): 54–60.
    [12]
    孙志峰,唐晓明,苏远大,等. 随钻多极子声波测井仪接收换能器的数值模拟[J]. 测井技术,2019,43(2):118–121. doi: 10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2019.02.002

    SUN Zhifeng, TANG Xiaoming, SU Yuanda, et al. Numerical simulation of transducer of LWD multipole acoustic logging tool[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2019, 43(2): 118–121. doi: 10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2019.02.002
    [13]
    栾桂冬, 张金铎, 王仁乾. 压电换能器和换能器阵[M]. 修订版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2005: 326-336.

    LUAN Guidong, ZHANG Jinduo, WANG Renqian. Transducers piezoelectric and arrays[M]. Revised ed. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2005: 326-336.
    [14]
    何晓,陈浩,王秀明. 充液圆槽中单极声波仪器响应数值模拟与分析[J]. 应用声学,2014,33(2):95–101. doi: 10.11684/j.issn.1000-310X.2014.02.001

    HE Xiao, CHEN Hao, WANG Xiuming. Numerical simulations and analyses of monopole sonic logging responses in a liquid-loaded trough[J]. Journal of Applied Acoustics, 2014, 33(2): 95–101. doi: 10.11684/j.issn.1000-310X.2014.02.001
    [15]
    吴金平,陆黄生,朱祖扬,等. 随钻声波测井声系短节模拟样机试验研究[J]. 石油钻探技术,2016,44(2):106–111. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.201602018

    WU Jinping, LU Huangsheng, ZHU Zuyang, et al. Experimental study on the simulation prototype of acoustic nipples for logging-while-drilling (LWD)[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(2): 106–111. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.201602018
    [16]
    朱祖扬,陆黄生,张卫,等. 随钻声波测井声系短节的研制与测试[J]. 石油钻探技术,2015,43(5):83–87. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.201505014

    ZHU Zuyang, LU Huangsheng, ZHANG Wei, et al. Development and testing of acoustic nipples while drilling[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2015, 43(5): 83–87. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.201505014
  • Related Articles

    [1]CHEN Dongfang, QUAN Bing, XIAO Xinqi, ZHANG Guangyu, CHEN Zhihua. Structure Design and Laboratory Testings of an Axial & Torsional Coupling Impactor[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2024, 52(1): 78-83. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2023104
    [2]TANG Ming, QI Xin, CAI Peng, WU Liugen. Development and Test of a MonoHole Expandable Casing System[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2023, 51(1): 45-50. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2022030
    [3]YU Yan, GAO Rui, JIA Yudan, QIAO Lei, ZHOU Wei. Laboratory Tests on the Rock Breaking Effects of Plasma Torch and Suggestions for Field Application[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2022, 50(4): 59-63. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2022034
    [4]LIU Xien, SUN Zhifeng, QIU Ao, LI Jie, LUO Bo, PENG Kaixuan, LUO Yulin. Design and Experiment for a Quadrupole Acoustic LWD Tool[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2022, 50(3): 125-131. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2022058
    [5]FU Xuan, LI Gensheng, HUANG Zhongwei, CHI Huanpeng, LU Peiqing. Laboratory Testing and Productivity Numerical Simulation for Fracturing CBM Radial Horizontal Wells[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(2): 99-105. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201602017
    [6]LI Zhiyong, CHEN Shuai, TAO Ye, MA Pan, YANG Chao. Experimental Study on High Strength Anti-H2S Gel Valves[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(2): 65-69. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201602011
    [7]Qian Kun, Yang Shenglai, Dong Junchang, Liu Hui, Liu Pan. A Study of Asphaltene Onset Pressure during High-Pressure Gas Injection[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2015, 43(2): 116-119. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201502020
    [8]Wang Xiaojing, Kong Xiangming, Zeng Min, Xu Chunhu, Zhao Zhiheng. Laboratory Research on a New Styrene Acrylic Latex Cement Slurry System[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2014, 42(2): 80-84. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2014.02.016
    [9]Shi Jin, Li Peng, Jia Jianghong. Laboratory Testing of Sand Control Effect for Mesh Type Screen[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2013, 41(3): 104-108. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2013.03.020
    [10]Yang Bin, Fang Yang, Wang Guozheng, Li Junping. Indoor Test of Heavy Oil Recovery by Gravity Drainage with Solvent[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2012, 40(3): 102-106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2012.03.021
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. 李润森,侯冰,周长静,何明舫,刘欣佳. 砂泥岩薄互储层缝控压裂力学机理及穿层判别准则. 中国海上油气. 2025(01): 156-166 .
    2. 侯冰,廖志豪,张庄,罗加伦,琚宜文,王文. 水力压裂物理模拟方法的数字化和智能化发展综述. 辽宁石油化工大学学报. 2025(02): 1-12 .
    3. 端祥刚,胡志明,常进,石雨昕,吴振凯,许莹莹. 页岩储层无支撑缝网区流动能力影响因素研究与进展. 特种油气藏. 2025(01): 22-31 .
    4. 吕振虎,吕蓓,罗垚,吴虎,李丽哲,王博. 基于光纤监测的段内多簇暂堵方案优化. 石油钻探技术. 2024(01): 114-121 . 本站查看
    5. 贾文婷,牟建业,李小伟,王新亮,张士诚,王丽峰. 射孔参数对砂砾岩储层压裂的影响. 石油钻采工艺. 2024(01): 97-105 .
    6. 房茂军,杜旭林,白玉湖,李昊,张浩,朱海燕. 多薄层致密砂岩储层大型水力压裂三维物理模拟实验. 石油实验地质. 2024(04): 786-798 .
    7. 王剑波,侯冰,滕卫卫,李小迪,刘见通,梁宝兴,张远凯,魏云. 致密砾岩储层力学特征与水力裂缝扩展机理研究进展. 石油科学通报. 2024(06): 972-990 .
    8. 陈瑞杰,熊志文,王瑞,郝少伟. 煤层顶板水力压裂裂缝扩展规律实验研究. 中国矿业. 2024(12): 208-216 .
    9. 刘剑,邵振宝,付京斌,吴珍锁,王耀宗,王会昊. 压裂路径对水力压裂裂纹扩展影响试验研究. 河北工程大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(06): 8-17 .
    10. 刘顺,刘建斌,陈鑫,周志祥,黄凯,杜恒毅,张亚龙,王宗振. 耐温自降解暂憋剂性能影响因素实验. 特种油气藏. 2024(06): 145-150 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (279) PDF downloads (41) Cited by(12)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return