Applicability of a New Device for Cementing Flushing Fluid Evaluation
-
摘要: 为了明确新型固井冲洗液评价装置的适用范围，根据评价装置内筒外壁面处与固井环空壁面剪切速率相等的原理，结合罗伯逊-斯蒂夫流变模式推导了冲洗液为牛顿、宾汉和幂律流体时其在内筒外壁处剪切速率的计算公式，并分析了不同流变模式冲洗液内筒外壁面处剪切速率与固井环空壁面剪切速率的误差。分析结果为：当冲洗液为牛顿流体时，评价装置在内筒外壁面处的剪切速率与固井界面处相等，不存在理论误差；当冲洗液为宾汉和幂律流体时，评价装置内筒外壁面处的剪切速率大于固井界面处，且剪切速率增量与内外筒间隙和冲洗液流变性质有关；当评价装置外内筒半径比限定在1.04~1.20时，冲洗液为幂律流体且流性指数大于0.6或为宾汉流体且动塑比小于1 Pa/（mPa·s）时，剪切速率相对误差在10%以内。研究结果表明，评价装置外内筒半径比越小，相对误差越小，其适用范围越大。Abstract: To clarify the application scope of an innovative evaluation device for cementing flushing fluid, a calculation model for shear rates of Newtonian, Bingham and power-law fluids on external wall of the inner barrel was established in accordance with the Robertson-Stiff rheological model and with consideration to the equivalent shear rate on external wall of the inner barrel and on annular sidewall in cementing. In addition, errors between the shear rate of the external sidewall of inner barrel and that of cementing annual sidewall under different rheological modes was analyzed. Research results showed that the shear rate at the inner wall of the device is equal to that at the cementing interface with no theoretical error for Newtonian fluids, while the shear rate of the inner cylinder wall is higher than that on the cementing interface, and the increase in shear rates is related to the inner and outer cylinder gap and rheological properties of the flushing fluids for Bingham and the power-law fluids. When the diameter ratio between the outer and inner barrel is 1.04-1.20 and the flushing power-law fluid flow indexes over 0.6, or plastic viscosity below 1.0 Pa/(mPa·s) for Bingham fluid, their relative error in the shear rate can be maintained less than 10%. Research results show the smaller ratio between external and internal barrels diameter would cause less relative error, and the application scope of the device would be more extensive.
-
Keywords:
- cementing /
- flushing fluid /
- evaluation device /
- applicability /
- rheological mode
-
-
[1] LU S,FOXENBERG W E.Double-emulsion spacer design for highly efficient invert emulsion[R].SPE 151604,2012.
[2] MASERATI G,DATURI E,DEL GAUDIO L,et al.Nano-emulsions as cement spacer improve the cleaning of casing bore during cementing operations[R].SPE 133033,2010.
[3] OSODE P I,OTAIBI M A,EL-KILANY K A,et al.Evaluation of nonreactive aqueous spacer fluids for oil-based mud displacement in open hole horizontal wells[R].SPE 161914,2012.
[4] ARANHA P E,MIRANDA C R,CARDOSO W F,et al.A comprehensive theoretical and experimental study on fluid displacement for oilwell cementing operations[R].SPE 150276,2012.
[5] CARRASQUILLA J,GUILLOT D J,ALI S A,et al.Microemulsion technology for synthetic-based mud removal in well cementing operations[R].SPE 156313,2012.
[6] 张明霞,向兴金,童志能,等.水泥浆前置液评价方法总论[J].钻采工艺,2002,25(6):81-83. ZHANG Mingxia,XIANG Xingjin,TONG Zhineng,et al.General narration of the evaluation approach to the slurry’s prepad fluid[J].Drilling Production Technology,2002,25(6):81-83. [7] 王乐顶,王长在,喻芬,等.固井冲洗液室内模拟评价方法研究[J].探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程),2014,41(10):54-57. WANG Leding,WANG Changzai,YU Fen,et al.Research on evaluation method of laboratory simulation of cementing flushing fluid[J].Exploration Engineering(Rock Soil Drilling and Tunneling),2014,41(10):54-57. [8] 西南石油大学,中国石油集团渤海钻探工程有限公司.一种基于剪切速率相等原理的固井冲洗液评价装置:201320710678.X[P].2014-05-14. Southwest Petroleum University,CNPC Bohai Drilling Engineering Company Limited.Well cementation flushing fluid evaluating device based on shearing rate equivalence principle:201320710678.X[P].2014-05-14. [9] 西南石油大学,中国石油集团渤海钻探工程有限公司.一种基于剪切速率相等原理的固井冲洗液评价装置及方法:201310562538[P].2014-01-29. Southwest Petroleum University,CNPC Bohai Drilling Engineering Company Limited.An apparatus and method was evaluated based on the principle of cementing a shear rate equal to rinse:201310562538[P].2014-01-29. [10] SAASEN A,SVANES K,OMLAND T H,et al.Well cleaning performance[R].SPE 87204,2004.
[11] 李克文,沈平平.原油与浆体流变学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994:22-105. LI Kewen,SHEN Pingping.Rheology of crude oil and slurry[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1994:22-105. [12] 王乐顶.页岩气水平井固井前置液体系研究及应用[D].西南石油大学,2014. WANG Leding.Research and application of flushing fluid for shale gas horizontal well cementing[D].Southwest Petroleum University,2014. -
期刊类型引用(5)
1. 刘金璐，李军，何举涛，杨宏伟，柳贡慧，李辉. 控压固井注入阶段流体密度和流变性分段预测方法. 石油钻探技术. 2024(01): 45-53 . 
本站查看
2. 张广标. 地质钻探冲洗液在断层破碎带中的应用. 地下水. 2024(05): 332-335 . 百度学术
3. 张举政，杨远光，孙勤亮，付家文，万浩东，谢应权. pH值和稀释剂对固井前甲酸盐钻井液性能的影响. 油田化学. 2019(01): 7-11 . 百度学术
4. 陈小华，张福铭，赵琥，代丹，王雪山. 油基钻井液用冲洗液PC–W31L的制备及性能研究. 石油钻探技术. 2019(02): 81-86 . 本站查看
5. 林四元，张杰，韩成，胡杰，田宗强，郑浩鹏. 东方气田浅部储层大位移水平井钻井关键技术. 石油钻探技术. 2019(05): 17-21 . 本站查看
其他类型引用(5)
计量
- 文章访问数: 19705
- HTML全文浏览量: 138
- PDF下载量: 15430
- 被引次数: 10
下载:
