The Optimization of Casing Programs for Horizontal Wells in the Fuling Shale Gas Field
-
摘要: 涪陵页岩气田前期水平井因导眼和一开井眼尺寸大，导致机械钻速低，并存在一开井塌严重、二开井壁易失稳等问题。为此，在分析涪陵地区钻井工程地质环境特点的基础上，确定了套管必封点，并根据William钻速方程缩小了导眼和一开井眼的尺寸，将表层套管下深从长兴组上提至飞仙关组顶部，二开中完井深由进入浊积砂体3.00~5.00 m，调整为进入龙马溪组地层50.00~100.00 m后下入技术套管，从而形成了优化后的井身结构。涪陵页岩气田水平井自2014年后期开始采用优化后的井身结构，2015年105口水平井与2013年采用原井身结构的30口水平井相比，平均机械钻速提高了65.74%，在井深增大的情况下，平均钻完井周期缩短了20.95%。这表明，优化井身结构后达到了提高机械钻速、减少井下故障、缩短钻井周期的目的。Abstract: Due to the large size of conductors and boreholes in the first drilling section in the Fuling Shale Gas Field,the horizontal wells had issues such as low ROP,severe sidewall collapse during the first drilling section,and borehole instability during the second drilling section.Accordingly,the sealing points of casing were determined based on analyzing drilling engineering and geologic features of Fuling Area,based on the William drilling-speed equation,sizes of conductors and borehole of the first drilling section were reduced,the set depth of surface casing was withdrawn upward from the Changxing Formation to the top of Feixianguan Formation,and in the second drilling section,set the depth of intermediate casing was changed from 3.00-5.00 m into the turbidite sandstone to 50.00-100.00 m into the Longmaxi Formation.The optimized casing program has been applied to horizontal wells in the Fuling shale gas since late 2014,as a result,the ROP of the horizontal wells got higher,and drilling cycle was shorted.Compared with the 30 horizontal wells drilled in 2013,the average ROP of 105 horizontal wells drilled in 2015 was improved by 65.74%,and the average drilling cycle was shorted by 20.95% while the average well depth increased,which showed the optimization of the casing program effectively enhanced ROP,reduced the downhole complication and a shortened drilling cycle.
-
Keywords:
- shale gas /
- horizontal wells /
- casing programs /
- penetration rate /
- Well Jiaoye 56-3HF /
- Fuling Shale Gas Field
-
-
[1] 周贤海.涪陵焦石坝区块页岩气水平井钻井完井技术[J].石油钻探技术,2013,41(5):26-30. ZHOU Xianhai.Drilling completion techniques used in shale gas horizontal wells in Jiaoshiba Block of Fuling Area[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2013,41(5):26-30. [2] 牛新明.涪陵页岩气田钻井技术难点及对策[J].石油钻探技术,2014,42(4):1-6. NIU Xinming.Drilling technology challenges and resolutions in Fuling Shale Gas Field[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2014,42(4):1-6. [3] 艾军,张金成,臧艳彬,等.涪陵页岩气田钻井关键技术[J].石油钻探技术,2014,42(5):9-15. AI Jun,ZHANG Jincheng,ZANG Yanbin,et al.The key drilling technologies in Fuling Shale Gas Field[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2014,42(5):9-15. [4] 林元华,宗玉宇,梁政,等.石油钻井机械钻速预测研究进展[J].石油钻探技术,2004,32(1):10-13. LIN Yuanhua,ZONG Yuyu,LIANG Zheng,et al.The developments of ROP prediction for oil drilling[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2004,32(1):10-13. [5] 张令存.胜利油区大尺寸井眼提高钻速技术研究[D].东营:石油大学(华东)石油工程学院,2004. ZHANG Lingcun.Technological research on increasing drilling rate in large-scale well in Shengli Oilfield[D].Dongying:University of Petroleum(Huadong),School of Petroleum Engineering,2004. -
期刊类型引用(5)
1. 陈立强，张启龙，吴洪波，李华朋，王赞，李佳旭. 水力喷射体积压裂裂缝间距优化方法研究. 石油化工应用. 2022(01): 31-36 . 
百度学术
2. 韩福勇，倪攀，孟海龙. 宽带暂堵转向多缝压裂技术在苏里格气田的应用. 钻井液与完井液. 2020(02): 257-263 . 百度学术
3. 房好青，赵兵，汪文智，周舟. 塔河油田靶向压裂预制缝转向技术模拟研究. 石油钻探技术. 2019(05): 97-103 . 本站查看
4. 仝少凯，高德利. 基于阿基米德双螺旋线原理的水力喷射压裂技术. 石油钻探技术. 2018(01): 90-96 . 本站查看
5. 唐述凯，李明忠，綦民辉，韩蕊，李根. 重复压裂前诱导应力影响新裂缝转向规律. 断块油气田. 2017(04): 557-560 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 20080
- HTML全文浏览量: 168
- PDF下载量: 16219
- 被引次数: 8
下载:
